My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 8:57:10 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 8:49:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/23/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 23,2017 <br /> Page 14 <br /> Mayor Roe and Councilmembers Etten and Willmus spoke in support of the list <br /> as presented by the consultant team. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted her concern was related to extra costs that might <br /> be incurred beyond the original consultant proposal for services. <br /> Ms. Major clarified that the land use aspect was not included as part of the Urban <br /> Land Institute group and also unlike intercept boards at Fairview Community <br /> Center. Ms. Major advised that representatives would be invited from organiza- <br /> tions actively involved in these issues to talk to the team in addition to and versus <br /> receiving input from the public meetings. While the meetings would be open to <br /> the public, Ms. Major noted that the team would be asking those representatives <br /> with specific expertise in those specific areas to talk; and further clarified that this <br /> would include participation by post-secondary schools beyond the two school dis- <br /> tricts (e.g. area colleges). <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed that she was also comfortable with these topics <br /> and proposed processes; stating that she saw it completely different from the re- <br /> cent Urban Land Institute presentation done for the City's benefit and leaning <br /> more heavily on housing than economic development from her perspective. <br /> While that was good information to receive, Councilmember Laliberte noted this <br /> would provide additional economic development information from other experts <br /> in the field and others in the community(e.g.business owners and managers). <br /> Similarly, Councilmember Willmus agreed that the Urban Land Institute panel <br /> presentation had proven interesting and highlighted community activities, but <br /> opined that the make-up of the panel and their presentation was solely focused on <br /> one aspect of the community (multi-family and senior housing). Councilmember <br /> Willmus stated that he wouldn't want that to forego other means of input by rely- <br /> ing solely on that panel input, when it may mean missing other significant items <br /> particularly in the business community. <br /> Councilmember Etten reiterated that he was comfortable with this list. Specific to <br /> the education aspect, Councilmember Etten spoke in support of the need to part- <br /> ner with both the Roseville and Mounds View school districts, whether or not the <br /> city had a controlling interest, since it still impacted the broader community. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed with Councilmember Etten, adding the importance of post- <br /> secondary education input as well. <br /> Interagency Meetings <br /> Ms. Major noted the intent for four topic-based interagency meetings specific to <br /> Housing/land use, economics, transportation/infrastructure, and water/open space. <br /> I� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.