CC_Minutes_2017_0123 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,January 23, 2017 Page 9 Lydia Major Ms. Major provided a brief review of the update process today, and for tonight's discussion, specifically introduced the Community Engagement Plan (CEP) out- line as referenced in the presentation and detailed in the LHB memorandum dated January 18, 2017. In reviewing each area of the plan, Ms. Major sought City Council feedback going forward. Key Messages -Ta lg ines With two options presented for a tagline for this effort, "Roseville 2040—Guiding our Future Together" or "Focus 2040," Ms. Major sought out input from council members. Mayor Roe asked if any thought had been given to re-using the Imagine Roseville tag line used in the 2005 community visioning process with Ms. Major advising that since that tagline was still being used by the city in several areas, the thought was to avoid confusing this project with those efforts or overlapping in any way with those efforts. Councilmembers McGehee and Willmus stated their preference for"Focus 2040." Councilmember Laliberte stated her preference for"Roseville 2040—Guiding our Future Together." Councilmember Laliberte opined that it included "Roseville" in the message, and suggested "Focus 2040" could be used as the tagline, but she liked the message sent out by the other, in working together with the community. Councilmember Etten stated that he was supportive of"Focus 2040" until hearing Councilmember Laliberte's comments. Mayor Roe agreed that he liked the use of "Roseville' in the first option, but wasn't sure about the"guiding" and suggested"finding"instead. Councilmember Willmus suggested an alternative option of"Roseville 2040." After further discussion, Councilmember Laliberte suggested "Roseville 2040 — Our Future Together." Without objection, the tagline "Roseville 2040 — Our Future Together" was ap- proved. Role of the Planning Commission Ms. Major reported that the Planning Commission's role as the steering commit- tee for the plan update was clear, along with the intent for City Council involve- ment throughout the process as outlined.