My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 10:00:50 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 9:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13, 2017 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Mayor Roe <br /> To tie into the CIP priority, Mayor Roe stated that a missing link is receiving a <br /> report on what has changed from year to year and rationale from staff's perspec- <br /> tive for those annual changes. <br /> Mayor Roe stated his interest in looking at the city's overall infrastructure, includ- <br /> ing pedestrian connectivity as part of the community's quality of life; an issue he <br /> found becoming more and more important for the marketplace and where people <br /> consider living. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she would also like to consider sustainabil- <br /> ity as part of that CIP review, opining that sustainability as a goal was a long way <br /> from done. While stated in the PPP document, Councilmember McGehee opined <br /> that "a more robust or inclusive view and listing of our assets" was still not to- <br /> gether. Councilmember McGehee noted that one area of concern she had was in <br /> not having all city building or facilities listed together, but currently listed sepa- <br /> rately, along with programs, opining that there needed to be a top level listing <br /> available to track all city assets under one umbrella. <br /> Specific to a deeper look at CIP assets, Councilmember Etten suggested a better <br /> explanation or understanding for the City Council without the City Council at- <br /> tempting to micromanage departments and their respective managers. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten sought clarification as to what level the City Council was look- <br /> ing for with its CIP and how the City Council should review each piece. <br /> Mayor Roe spoke in support of more detail on streets and water/sewer assets. <br /> While talking about them briefly at preliminary budget discussions about infor- <br /> mation desired by the City Council for the 2018 budget, Mayor Roe suggested <br /> that instead of a one-line item the actual streets or projects be identified so the <br /> City Council would know from year to year how and why the CIP is changing and <br /> steps where they may be in agreement or at least made aware. <br /> Councilmember Willmus agreed with Mayor Roe's observation; clarifying that he <br /> wasn't interested in the City Council directing dollars, but was seeking a more <br /> thorough review by staff to the City Council of where needs were or where funds <br /> may be over-allocated in one area for repurposing to another. Councilmember <br /> Willmus opined that this came into play if the City Council could then shift those <br /> dollars to alleviate needs elsewhere, but noted the need for that view and alloca- <br /> tion level. If staff is aware of areas where the city is falling short or exceeding, <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that the City Council needed to be made aware of <br /> that as well. <br /> As an example over the last few years when the water tower rehabilitation project <br /> was moved up due to a number of factors, Mayor Roe noted that the process for <br /> making those determinations isn't always known or completely understood by the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.