Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13,2017 <br /> Page 13 <br /> City Council until closer to year-end with CIP review and when funds don't add <br /> up. Mayor Roe stated his agreement with his colleagues for the City Council's <br /> need to know the how and why as soon as known by staff to help them and the <br /> public. However, Mayor Roe also agreed that no further involvement than that <br /> was being sought by the City Council. <br /> In response, Councilmember McGehee stated that in order for her to concur with <br /> her colleagues, she needed to be assured that everything in the CIP is being ade- <br /> quately addressed and not simply eliminated or left unaddressed; thus her desire <br /> for a more overarching picture of facilities versus a view by program. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon responded that this discussion aligned itself well with in- <br /> ternal staff discussions related to budget information and how to present it. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon agreed that the basic information should include awareness for the City <br /> Council and public to know and for staff to comprehensively say how and why <br /> changes are coming about. While some unexpected thing occur from year to year, <br /> Mr. Trudgeon stated they were usually few; and agreed with the importance for <br /> everyone to be on the same page and have a general understanding. If the City <br /> Council chose to make this a priority, Mr. Trudgeon voiced his and staff's whole- <br /> hearted support. <br /> While agreeing it was important to look at the CIP on an annual and five-year ba- <br /> sis, Mayor Roe opined that it remained important to continue that long-term view <br /> over twenty years (e.g. fire engines) and change the CIP accordingly as needed <br /> and as part of annual discussions. By having shorter-term reviews in addition to <br /> the twenty-year CIP review, Mayor Roe noted it added one more layer to the <br /> available information and planning process. <br /> Mayor Roe stated his support for Councilmember Etten's new "Inclusive" priori- <br /> ty, especially coming off the Imagine Roseville process, possibly creating a num- <br /> ber of different recommendations in different areas, including but not limited to: <br /> leadership in city government and staffing diversity and recommendations about <br /> cit policies in other areas. While agreeing that this would be a good category to <br /> add, Mayor Roe suggested some items currently included under "Economic De- <br /> velopment"could be moved into that category. <br /> Mayor Roe also suggested removing"move up housing" from the current list. <br /> General Discussion <br /> If removing"move up housing" from the list, Councilmember Willmus suggested <br /> replacing it with a housing style currently lacking in the community, one-level <br /> living. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed with that comment, adding that housing was <br /> needed on small lots. <br />