My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 10:00:50 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 9:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13, 2017 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Specific to cost benefit analysis, Councilmember Willmus opined that something <br /> the City Council needed to be cognizant of was that if the group didn't define the <br /> purpose or what constitutes benefits and costs, it could become cumbersome and <br /> could become complicated rather quickly unless some clearly-defined parameters <br /> were agreed upon by the City Council, community and staff. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed with that statement; and specific to housing as a <br /> priority, stated that she would go on record that she'd rather help fund housing <br /> stock not currently available in Roseville versus funding housing stock already <br /> available in the community. Councilmember Laliberte opined that if there was <br /> some other hierarchy in or for the community, it needed further conversation. <br /> In addition to the continuum of available housing stock, Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee stated her support for any changes that would make any and all housing ac- <br /> cessible. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that a lot of these policies fell into the realm of the city's current <br /> housing goals; and stated his interest in not putting too many priorities in place to <br /> avoid it becoming a"to do"list with too many areas of focus. <br /> In response, Councilmember Etten stated that he was a huge fan of connectivity, <br /> something he considered very important to the community's viability and quality <br /> of life. However, since the city was paying a consultant to review the transporta- <br /> tion and pathway plans as part of the broader comprehensive plan review, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten asked if it was needed as a priority on the PPP, since it would <br /> happen due to those steps already in place. <br /> While that could be the case, Councilmember McGehee opined that some areas <br /> that she had discussed with Public Works Director Culver didn't fall into the gen- <br /> eral pathway scheme, opining that some areas had more difficult issues in achiev- <br /> ing t connectivity and providing pedestrian safety. She used her side of town as <br /> an example. <br /> Specific to connectivity, Councilmember Willmus noted the importance of retain- <br /> ing that in the PPP. While having had pathway task forces and committees and <br /> comprehensive plans in place for decades, Councilmember Willmus noted that <br /> while some progress had been made, it wasn't enough. Given that, Councilmem- <br /> ber Willmus opined that it needed continued focus to receive more attention that it <br /> had over the last decade or so; and by bringing it to the forefront it served to re- <br /> peatedly remind the City Council, staff and the community of its importance. <br /> Mayor Roe concluded that two items appeared to be rising to the level of addi- <br /> tions to the PPP: pedestrian connectivity and access, and Councilmember Etten's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.