CC_Minutes_2017_0213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February 13,2017 Page 14 Councilmember Etten stated his agreement in retaining the Economic Develop- ment goal and revising it, but asked if"housing"was an actual priority of the City Council or simply happened in the background. Councilmember Etten stated his agreement with Councilmember Willmus on the need for single-level housing; but questioned if that was a City Council priority, was the city in turn willing to fund it as a policy priority for funding or to support developers undertaking that housing style. Councilmember Etten stated those were different discussions for him; and noted that "move up housing" had been desired by the city, but the market took over and the city wasn't called upon to subsidize it. However, Councilmember Etten stated his interest in having more discussion around that idea. Councilmember McGehee questioned the priority to "increase the value of exist- ing homes," recognizing that the city didn't need to do anything when the market increases, and since there were few factors the Council could control, questioned its retention as a goal. As an afterthought, Councilmember McGehee revised her suggestion to consider the review of the multi-family housing licensing program as a part of priority planning since it was actually a task. Specific to cost benefit analyses, Coun- cilmember McGehee spoke in support of using them anywhere possible. Mayor Roe opined that "cost benefit analysis" fell into the task versus priority ar- ea as well. Mayor Roe also questioned if other areas (e.g. rental licensing and in- creased housing values) also fell under ongoing activities that could be acknowl- edged but didn't necessarily need to be shown as a priority. However, Mayor Roe stated the importance of not losing sight of those areas either; suggesting that they be considered as part of the continuing review of programs. Councilmember McGehee opined that "cost benefit analysis" should be a policy not a task. It was a policy defining the City Council evaluated some items. Mayor Roe noted that, since the 2016 PPP, that analysis had already been added to several city policy revisions in the interim. Councilmember Willmus recognized Councilmember Etten's comments on hous- ing, while at the same time and depending on the type of development and its lo- cation,-stated that all of those considerations should remain on the table. Whether or not it should remain a goal as currently identified, Councilmember Willmus agreed probably not; but noted that over the last year or so, some tools had been implemented by the city to help facilitate desired development (e.g. resurrection of the PUD process)that could help spur that type of development in the future.