My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-03-28_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-03-28_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 9:25:15 AM
Creation date
3/29/2017 9:17:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/28/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 11, February 28, 2017 <br />458 <br />459 Further discussion included the status of solar energy efforts; the city's space <br />460 needs study anticipated by mid-June (June PWETC agenda to review architectural <br />461 recommendations); and current status of the city's LED conversion — interior and <br />462 exterior. <br />463 <br />464 Member Heimerl suggested a summer field trip with longer daylight hours (May <br />465 or July agendas) for citywide projects of interest to the PWETC. Member Seigler <br />466 suggested it may be of interest to the PWETC to view the Metropolitan Council's <br />467 sanitary sewer line replacement project; with Mr. Culvcj lj arifying that the bids <br />468 were anticipated for award in May and the earliest w4 start date anticipated in <br />469 October of 2017 through the spring of 2019, opini ere wouldn't be much to <br />470 observe before the winter months. <br />471 <br />472 Member Wozniak suggested review of out <br />anics collection <br />473 program; and research by staff to see if t y had yet to identi sites in and <br />474 around Roseville for expansion. Me Woz suggested at fieldtrip <br />475 could be to the Washington -Ramsey �ou ecy facility in N port, MN. <br />476 <br />477 With only Member Seigler ving attended r of the Eureka MRF, Chair <br />478 Cihacek suggested that may ood fall feel after the upcoming busier <br />479 agenda months had been comple <br />480 <br />481 Chair Cihacek suggested a policy ver�iew, including educating the PWETC on <br />482 where the money comes from and how it is designated, as well as an inventory of <br />483 stormwater management for residential and commercial properties as researched <br />484 by staff ^ agenda). Chair Cihack opined that this would serve as good <br />485 background on the next step conversat�ms planned over the summer and inform <br />486 the Qawnukensive plan with a citywide perspective. <br />487 <br />488 that vein and at the of Member Wozniak Mr. Culver reviewed the <br />489 arterly fee p by si family homes of a certain size $11/quarter - <br />490 $45/ye ), with fa y and apartment buildings, as well as commercial <br />491 buildi aying a ch larger fee. <br />492 <br />493 8. Adjourn <br />494 Member Traino moved, Member Wozniak seconded, adjournment of the meeting <br />495 at approximately 7:43 p.m. <br />496 <br />497 Ayes:5 <br />498 Nays:0 <br />499 Motion carried. <br />500 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.