Laserfiche WebLink
46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />57 <br />58 <br />59 <br />60 <br />61 <br />62 <br />63 <br />64 <br />65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />68 <br />69 <br />70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />76 <br />77 <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />81 <br />82 <br />83 <br />84 <br />85 <br />86 <br />87 <br />88 <br />89 <br />90 <br />91 <br />5. <br />Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 2, February 28, 2017 <br />delivered more on an as -needed basis until further researched; and this year's mild <br />winter allowing for catch up on additional maintenance and operational issues <br />(e.g. street sweeping earlier than normal, tree trimming). Mr. Culver reported that <br />the wear and tear on road equipment may be less this year than normal, but also <br />noted that the city still did a considerable amount of pre -treating and ice control <br />measures during the winter months. <br />For the benefit of the listening audience, Member Heimerl asked staff to reassure <br />residents of the city's water system in lieu of another system problem in the City <br />of Blaine; and asked if staff was confident of Roseville's er system and didn't <br />anticipate similar issues. <br />Mr. Culver responded that city staff was confident of its SCADA and back-up <br />systems in place; as well as its water supply system. As a precautionary measure, <br />Mr. Culver reported that staff was doin oaough review of its back-up <br />systems; and as mentioned at the last P 0 C meeting, the city's largest concern <br />was with its booster station, wit nies otted in the city t capital <br />improvement program (CIP) to upgrade eha to the boostertation, with <br />the city in the process of accelerating those (e.g. new generator) to ensure <br />continued delivery. <br />Member Heimerl also noted re reports of s opening fire hydrants <br />in Big Lake, MN, and asked if t e was any imilar sue in Roseville that may <br />result in a drop in ressure by op ing key fir hydrants that could put Roseville <br />at a disadvanta ere was any way to detect or notice pressure issues in the <br />system. <br />Mr. Culver responded that, while unsur f an interruption of small scale would be <br />im oticed, there were m ors in place on all water towers and within <br />oWosation that checked water pressure at various points. Also, Mr. <br />W <br />lver noted that if any hydrants were spewing water, the public would alert city <br />Surface Water Management Plan (CSWMP) 2017 <br />Enviromne'1111kocialist Ryan Johnson introduced Ms. Rebecca Nestingten of <br />SEH, Inc. fo eeting #3 of this updated draft of the CSWMP, and to receive <br />public input on this iteration. Ms. Nestingten reviewed the goals of the update <br />including implementation of new and innovative ideas, an update of goals and <br />policies and an issues assessment, and alignment of the CSWMP with the three <br />watershed districts within which various areas of Roseville operated. <br />Ms. Nestingten noted that public comment had also been sought through an <br />electronic survey as well as on the former Speak Up! Roseville. org portal, with an <br />unfortunate response rate of five responses as of October 18, 2016 and only <br />sixteen as of January 13, 2017. Of those few responses received, Ms. Nestingten <br />