Laserfiche WebLink
Ultimately, it was decided by the City Council to explore the possibility of <br />o <br />keeping the current footprint with the possiblyofadding a basement foundation. <br />Commission Size <br />Originally, the intent was to have less people on the committee. However, it was <br />o <br />decided to accept all applicants.Having a larger group with variedbackgrounds <br />wasappreciated and provided for greaterinput and detail. <br />Mission and Purpose <br />Meeting Schedule <br />Advisory Team Recommendations <br />1.Replace the Clubhouse <br />Create a flexible space to support current and future golf needs <br />o <br />Anticipate future operational requirements –independent of golf functions <br />o <br />Create a gathering space for non-golfers in the community <br />o <br />Provide a niche in Roseville’s facility rentals <br />o <br />The Advisory Team recommends that the first step in thereplacement process <br />o <br />would be the contracting of professional design services. The buildoutwould <br />ideally be Fall of 2017after the golf season ended. <br />2.Use identified funding options <br />Park Dedication Funds <br />o <br />Remaining Parks and RecreationRenewal Program Funding <br />o <br />The “Best Value”process had a large impact on having this additional <br />money. Holt applauded the City Council for allowing the Parks and <br />Recreation Department to utilize this process. <br />Current Golf Course Fund Balance <br />o <br />In addition to the 3 identified funding options the committee also recommends <br />o <br />keeping all options open during the process, including a potential bond or levy. <br />3.Plan for supporting infrastructure <br />Whenlooking at the Clubhouse replacement,take into consideration all of the <br />o <br />structures and supporting elementson the sitesuch as the maintenance shopand <br />parking lot. <br />4.Reconsider Cedarholm as an Enterprise Fund <br />Commission Chair Newby asked for clarification on what constitutes an Enterprise Fund. Holt <br />stated that an Enterprise Fund is essentially a self-sustaining program. Newby reiterated that the <br />basic principle is that the revenues generated from fees should cover the operatingand capital <br />costs. <br />Commission Chair Newby thanked Holt for the comprehensive overview. He questioned what the <br />other options are for Cedarholm if it was not an Enterprise Fund. Brokke responded that it could <br />potentially be operated under a typical Parks and Recreation Fund. However, the goal would still <br />be to earn as much revenue as possible. <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />