2017-4-4_PR Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

32 The process thus far has been guided by the Advisory Team Report and Recommendations, the Parks 33 and Recreation Commission at their monthly meetings and additional community and staff input. 34 35 Overall,it appears that community desires, recommendations of the Advisory Team and the community 36 input since gathered are consistent with progress made. 37 38 Staff will be at your meeting to discussprogress to date and seek guidance in the following areas: 39 Project Scope 40 Project Budget 41 Funding Sources 42 Historical Society Considerations 43 Other 44 PO OLICYBJECTIVE 45 It is the policy of the City to provide a community process and a thoughtful approach when making 46 improvements to City facilities. 47 FI INANCIAL MPACTS 48 As identified in the 2016 Advisory Team Final Report, the recommended financial options to support 49 the capital needs of replacing the Cedarholm Golf Course Clubhouse/Maintenance Facility include the 50 following: 51 52 A.Maximize the use of current funding 53 The Advisory Team believes the clubhouse can be replacedwithout a tax levy increaseat 54 this time by using current Park Dedication funds, remaining Renewal Program funds and 55 using the Golf Course Fund balance. 56 If necessary, consider all funding options including a levy and bonding 57 58 B.If a levy is used, the Advisory Team strongly suggests identifying a sunset without renewal or 59 repurpose 60 Levy funding may be needed to support clubhouse operations if other uses, outside of 61 golf operations, are included in future plans for the clubhouse 62 63 C.Pursue partnerships and collaborations 64 Consider opportunities that could provide funding in exchange for use, philanthropic 65 consideration and naming rights 66 Grants and other opportunities 67 68 69 70 71 SR TAFF ECOMMENDATION 72 Discussion and guidance suggested in the following areas: 73 Project Scope 74 Project Budget 75 Funding Sources 76 Page 2 of 3