2016-12-06_PR Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

,. F . �Community Input ; ; i The Advisory Team used a number of avenues for receiving and sharing information with the community: • Advisory Team Members were encouraged to solicit input from the broader community • City of Roseville Website o Speak Up Roseville • Council and Parks and Recreation Commission Updates • Parks and Recreation Brochure • Nextdoor.com • City of Roseville News Release o Roseville Review Article Approach and Meeting Schedule � The Advisory Team met on nine, publicly noticed occasions. Most meetings were held at the Cedarholm Clubhouse. Three meetings were relocated to other community facilities due to scheduled Golf Course functions. • The Advisory Team met with local golf industry professionals, participated in group exercises that encouraged creative, forward thinking and openly discussed needs, options and possibilities. • The meeting schedule followed a progression of golf operation themes to facilitate round-table discussions and formulate recommendations. o Meeting #1: March 17: Cedarholm Golf Course and Clubhouse Background Information and History o Meeting #2: April 28: Local Golf Industry Professionals Panel o Meeting #3: May 12: Partnerships and Other Users: Current and Potential o Meeting #4: May 19: Function and Uses: Current and Potential o Me@ting #5: JUne 9: Funding Options (meeting @ Autumn Grove Park Building� o Meeting #6: July 14: Findings Discussion and Report Development (meeting @ Nature Center) o Meeting #7: August 1: Sub-Committee Meeting to Review Preliminary Draft Paul Grotehuts, Greg Haag, Dave Holt, Rynetta Renford, Eileen Stanley o Meeting #8: August 11: Draft Report Review o Meeting #9: August 16: Report Review and Public Presentation (meeting @ Lexington Park Building� 13�Page City of Roseville Clubhouse Renewal Proposal Cedarholm Golf Course Clubhouse Replacement Design and Cost Estimates