Laserfiche WebLink
ЌВ <br /> Ultimately, it was decided by the City Council to explore the possibility of <br />o <br />ЍЉ <br />keeping the current footprint with the possibly of adding a basement foundation. <br />ЍЊ <br /> Commission Size <br />ЍЋ <br /> Originally, the intent was to have less people on the committee. However, it was <br />o <br />ЍЌ <br />decided to accept all applicants. Having a larger group with varied backgrounds <br />ЍЍ <br />was appreciated and provided for greater input and detail. <br />ЍЎ <br /> Mission and Purpose <br />ЍЏ <br /> Meeting Schedule <br />ЍА <br /> Advisory Team Recommendations <br />ЍБ <br />1. Replace the Clubhouse <br />ЍВ <br /> Create a flexible space to support current and future golf needs <br />o <br />ЎЉ <br /> Anticipate future operational requirements independent of golf functions <br />o <br />ЎЊ <br /> Create a gathering space for non-golfers in the community <br />o <br />ЎЋ <br /> Provide a nich <br />o <br />ЎЌ <br /> The Advisory Team recommends that the first step in the replacement process <br />o <br />ЎЍ <br />would be the contracting of professional design services. The buildout would <br />ЎЎ <br />ideally be Fall of 2017 after the golf season ended. <br />ЎЏ <br />2. Use identified funding options <br />ЎА <br /> Park Dedication Funds <br />o <br />ЎБ <br /> Remaining Parks and Recreation Renewal Program Funding <br />o <br />ЎВ <br />The Best Value process had a large impact on having this additional <br />ЏЉ <br />money. Holt applauded the City Council for allowing the Parks and <br />ЏЊ <br />Recreation Department to utilize this process. <br />ЏЋ <br /> Current Golf Course Fund Balance <br />o <br />ЏЌ <br /> In addition to the 3 identified funding options the committee also recommends <br />o <br />ЏЍ <br />keeping all options open during the process, including a potential bond or levy. <br />ЏЎ <br />3. Plan for supporting infrastructure <br />ЏЏ <br /> When looking at the Clubhouse replacement, take into consideration all of the <br />o <br />ЏА <br />structures and supporting elements on the site such as the maintenance shop and <br />ЏБ <br />parking lot. <br />ЏВ <br />4. Reconsider Cedarholm as an Enterprise Fund <br />АЉ <br />Commission Chair Newby asked for clarification on what constitutes an Enterprise Fund. Holt <br />АЊ <br />stated that an Enterprise Fund is essentially a self-sustaining program. Newby reiterated that the <br />АЋ <br />basic principle is that the revenues generated from fees should cover the operating and capital <br />АЌ <br />costs. <br />АЍ <br />Commission Chair Newby thanked Holt for the comprehensive overview. He questioned what the <br />АЎ <br />other options are for Cedarholm if it was not an Enterprise Fund. Brokke responded that it could <br />АЏ <br />potentially be operated under a typical Parks and Recreation Fund. However, the goal would still <br />АА <br />be to earn as much revenue as possible. <br />АБ <br /> <br />Ћ <br /> <br /> <br />