2016-08-04_PR Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Advisory Team Recommendations 1 2 Recommendation Summary 3 4 In November 2015, the Roseville City Councilrequested the Parks andRecreation Commission engage the 5 community to analyzethe replacement of the Cedarholm Golf Course Clubhouse. The Council directed the 6 commission to also consider funding options for the replacement and report back with recommendations. 7 8 Commissioners worked with Parks and Recreation staff to develop an approach for the replacement of the 9 clubhouse. The approach is very similar to previous engagement processes used by the Parks and 10 Recreation Commission and a process the City Council has been supportive of, i.e. Parks and Recreation 11 Master Plan Update, Harriet Alexander Nature Center Planning Committee and the OVAL Task Force. 12 13 On January 25, 2016, the Roseville City Council approved a Parks and Recreation Commission 14 recommended community involvement process for the Replacement of the Cedarholm Golf Course 15 Clubhouse that included a 23-member Advisory Team consisting of Roseville residents and a 6-month 16 timeline for review, analysis, discussion, engagement, reporting and recommendation. 17 18 Based on guidance from the City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission and an agreed upon 19 community involvement process, the Cedarholm Golf Course Clubhouse Advisory Team recommends; 20 1.Rebuilding the Clubhouse rather than repairing the current structure. The Advisory Team makes this 21 recommendation with strong consideration for current facility and community needs and future 22 operations requirements. 23 2.Funding options to support the capital needs of the Golf Course, including the clubhouse structure and 24 maintenance facility. The Advisory Team believes; 25 A.There is an opportunity to maximize current funding options and limit levy funding (if needed at 26 all). 27 i.e. use of park dedication funds, remaining Parks and Recreation Renewal Program 28 funding and current Golf Course fund balance 29 B.It is prudent at this time, to plan for the entire golf course including supporting infrastructure. 30 C.Partnerships and/or collaborations should be explored. 31 D.Considerations should be made for reclassifying golf operations as a recreation fee fund. 32 33 3.Planning for current and future site needs, and, where possible, replace or improve golf course 34 supporting infrastructure at this time. The Advisory Team feels it is sensible and far-sighted to look at 35 the entire area that supports the golf experience and create a plan for the site that works together to 36 meet current expectations and future needs, including improved parking and accommodating 37 maintenance and storage needs. 38 39 7 Cedarholm Clubhouse Replacement Advisory Team