My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2017 2:41:22 PM
Creation date
4/20/2017 2:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 20, 2017 <br />Page 12 <br />If the City Council was interested, Mayor Roe suggested City staff and/or coun- <br />cilmembers being available to testify or provide additional support for the legisla- <br />tion, once they had reviewed it. <br />2018 Fire Department Projected Budget and Staffing Plan <br />Chief Brosnahan reviewed proposed 2018 staffing and budget implications for an <br />additional projected $78,000 as the levy impact. Chief Brosnahan further re- <br />viewed the organizational chart for the Fire Department; full-time staffing pro- <br />jected at 22-24 as the long-range goal and involving the attrition plan anticipated <br />since 2014; with a goal of 15 full-time employees by 2018 as a huge step in tran- <br />sitioning the department as an organization. <br />As a point of reference, Chief O'Neill compared the Fire Budget to other cities, <br />call volume and cost per resident as provided in presentation materials. <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Chief O'Neill clarified that he had not <br />compared other city budgets and levies at the level of debt service. <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Chief O'Neill further clarified that he did not sepa- <br />rate out other cities that operated ambulance services (e.g. Maplewood or Edina). <br />Councilmember McGehee addressed her concerns in the long-term operation of <br />the Fire Relief Fund and those part-time firefighters still involved at this point; <br />and transition to the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERA) instead. <br />Chief O'Neill clarified that based on the direction of the City Manager and City <br />Council, no additional part-time firefighters had been hired, nor was there any in- <br />tention to do so. Through attrition, Chief O'Neill opined that the number would <br />eventually reach zero, but depending on other variables, he was unable to antici- <br />pate how many may be involved at any one time. Typically of the current thirty <br />remaining part-time firefighters, Chief O'Neill advised that approximately half <br />would respond to a call back situation and he assumed the same number would <br />equate moving forward. Chief O'Neill advised that he was watching the part-time <br />staffing level closely and this would most likely involve looking for three addi- <br />tional firefighters in 2018, bringing the department to its final stage of stability. <br />Chief O'Neill clarified that the department was not nor would it be reliant on part- <br />time firefighters, but that it would benefit the department at a $15 per hour part- <br />time salary versus that of a full-time $35 per hour overtime rate per employee; <br />and continued to keep the staffing level up and involved, but would eventually <br />come to none. <br />Specific to the Fire Relief Association, of the thirty remaining, Chief O'Neill re- <br />ported that about twenty-three part-time firefighters remain. Given the City <br />Council's past decision to move from the Relief Association to PERA, Chief <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.