My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2017 2:41:22 PM
Creation date
4/20/2017 2:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 20, 2017 <br />Page 6 <br />smaller unit inspections had come from, such as from the recent property manag- <br />er's meeting. <br />Ms. Collins responded that inspection of smaller rental properties had been inter- <br />nally discussed by staff for some time, and clarified that it had not come about as <br />a result of the recent property manager's meeting, since that was held for multi- <br />family property owners. Ms. Collins noted that it had often been discussed and <br />explored by staff, with equal feedback from those smaller rental property owners <br />who were happy they didn't need inspections; balanced by the interest by the city <br />in having a registration/contact list available, and interest in providing equity of <br />services to renters similar to those multi -family buildings. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that a number of residents had come to the city <br />about some of those single-family rental properties in residential areas that were <br />problematic. Therefore, Councilmember McGehee questioned if the current rent- <br />al registration and/or nuisance code were addressing that issue. Councilmember <br />McGehee questioned the need to inspect condominiums, or in those smaller rent- <br />als (e.g. duplexes) where the owner occupied one unit and rented out the other <br />unit. However, for single-family homes being rented out or used as investment <br />properties, Councilmember McGehee stated her support for having them inspect- <br />ed. <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated that she had some concerns about this proposal <br />for smaller rentals, opining that it didn't seem to her to be a solution to the prob- <br />lems she was hearing about with pockets of single-family homes being rented, <br />which this proposal would not change at all. With the registration system for <br />those smaller rentals done on an honor system, Councilmember Laliberte stated <br />that the proposal wouldn't serve to change that either. Councilmember Laliberte <br />stated that she wouldn't be prepared to go the route of inspecting smaller rentals; <br />and opined that if carving out rentals other than duplexes with one side owner - <br />occupied and/or condominiums, it simply created a different equity discussion. <br />Mayor Roe agreed that he continued to have concerns in inspecting rental proper- <br />ties of less than five units until he more clearly understood if they created a prob- <br />lem related to other single-family properties in the community. Mayor Roe also <br />agreed that the city's nuisance ordinance and other code enforcement options <br />were available if there were nefarious activities going on in any rental property, <br />with similar recourses available as for owner -occupied homes as well. Mayor <br />Roe noted that one concern was that he was conscious of different levels of in- <br />vestment for single-family property owners and their ability to pay licensing fees <br />and handle the complexities of that system, also heard about when initially ad- <br />dressing the program several years ago. Mayor Roe noted that, after the pushback <br />received from those property owners at that time, the task force created at that <br />time had reviewed the proposed program with the outcome being for a registration <br />versus inspection/licensing program for those smaller rental properties. For him <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.