2017-5-2_PR Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

53per sq. ft.The potential total building costwould be $1,900,000-$2,100,000. Thisprice does not include the 54additional sitework and managementcosts, which areanticipated to beas follows: 55Patio –$100,000 56Parking lot expansion-$55,000 57Course modifications $25,000 58Cart storage $30,000 59Utilities-$40,000 60Planning and management costs -$285,000(plans and specifications and contract management) 61Best Value contracting $20,000 62 63Existing fundspreviouslyidentifiedinclude Park Dedicationat$1,300,000, RenewalProgramat $400,000, 64Golf Course Fundat$200,000for a total of $1,900,000.The Commission engaged in adiscussion of the 65funding possibilities included a potential levy and bonding. 66 67Brokke presentedtwo potential buildingimageoptions. He notedthatahigher ceiling would be preferred in 68the banquet facility butvarying rooflinesare not desirablefrom a maintenance perspectiveandwould 69increase the costof the project. 70 71Commissioner Heikkila questioned if there could be apotential use of solar panels on the site. Brokke 72mentionedthat the costfor solarhas historicallyshownlongpaybacks.Commissioner Newby suggested the 73use of larger windows for solar gain. Commission Chair Gelbach inquired if the design would need to be 74modified for solar panelsand if that should be considered to accommodate a solar option in the future. 75Brokke respondedthat load requirements wouldmore than likelyneed to be increased based on the weight 76of the solar panels and that sustainability efforts would be part of this project.The Commission suggested 77that the ease of short term and long-term maintenanceshouldbe kept in mind when deciding the design of 78the new building. 79 80Commissioner Baggenstoss askedaboutthe percent difference in cost between the two potential designs. 81Brokke respondedthat we do not have thatlevel of detail available. 82 83Commissioner Heikkila questionedwherethe youthgolfprogram, which hashistoricallybeenheld on the 84practice green, would be located.McDonagh sharedthat the program could be movedto a different park 85where a small SNAG Course would be set-up. 86 87TheCommission discussed the pros and cons of the potential building forms;focusing on landscape, 88roofline and skylight options. 89 DEER REDUCTION REPORT REVIEW 906. 91Based on resident concerns of highdeer population in Roseville, the City Council authorized the United 92States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to complete a deer reduction program in 4 City locations: 93Central ParkNature Center Area 94Owasso Hills Park 95Ladyslipper Park (This Park was baited but no deer were removed) 96Roseville Leaf Compost Site 97 98 99Twenty deer were removed in one night (1/31/17). The USDA donatedthe meat to needy families.General 100findings from the reduction effortincluded: 10170% were female 10257% of the adult females had 0-1 fetus(A healthy female should be carrying 2 fawns)