My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0417
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 11:43:13 AM
Creation date
5/10/2017 11:42:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/17/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 17, 2017 <br /> Page 4 <br /> community use aspect were still being reviewed for clarity; including taking into <br /> consideration the age of both existing pools and whether the best option would be <br /> for repair or replacement. Ms. Thompson reported that the School Board was <br /> awaiting results of a feasibility study on the physical state of both pools. <br /> Superintendent Sicoli advised that, as part of this process, the School District had <br /> held not only community meetings, but through their participation on criteria <br /> committees throughout this process, Roseville senior citizens using the Fairview <br /> Community Center pool had been consulted for their feedback. Given the small <br /> number of pools in the Twin Cities area with warm temperatures, Superintendent <br /> Sicoli reported that the consensus was that those citizens felt strongly that the <br /> School District shouldn't go to one pool for the swim team, but to take the com- <br /> munity into consideration before proceeding into the future; and recognized that <br /> both existing pools needed considerable work. <br /> Board Chair Traynor stated that, one thing he'd personally learned through this <br /> process, was that many other school districts may not have as many facilities de- <br /> voted to the broader community. Instead, those facilities may be run by cities or <br /> other localities. While it varies across communities, Board Chair Traynor noted <br /> that the School Board continues to support the tradition of our school district by <br /> focusing on providing those community services. <br /> With that historical perspective, Board Member Boguszewski suggested that one <br /> thing that could come out of this discussion was whether the current alignment <br /> was relevant in addressing both the needs of the district and city. <br /> From her personal perspective, Councilmember McGehee opined that the district <br /> had a lot of resources used by the community, and while the city has a considera- <br /> ble amount of infrastructure it's currently updating, in recognizing the importance <br /> of the school district and its available resources for community needs, it was of <br /> major importance to address that partnership. Councilmember McGehee noted <br /> the city's ongoing and recent updates to the pathway structure, skating center and <br /> Oval, and other amenities, but lack of a pool. Councilmember McGehee noted <br /> the resources provided by the school district including the senior center at Fair- <br /> view and the pool, together with the resources provided by the City comprise <br /> nearly a complete "community center" offering. Acknowledging Councilmem- <br /> ber Etten's description of a distributed concept when planning for the Parks Re- <br /> newal, Councilmember McGehee opined that to her it seemed that a pool and <br /> possibly a gym were the only"community center"pieces missing pieces. <br /> Moving back to the priorities identified by the Criteria Committee and their deci- <br /> sion-making as detailed in the slide, with their core criteria for safety and basic <br /> functions, Board Member Gogins noted that a pool was at the bottom of the list <br /> before addressing the great needs of higher priority. Board Member Gogins noted <br /> that realistically all could not be delivered or expectations fulfilled, but any areas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.