Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, April 17, 2017 <br /> Page 5 <br /> where partnerships could help meet those community needs area obviously very <br /> desirable. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the good partnership history between the district and city over <br /> the years; and as evidenced during the 2010 Park Master Plan process, many of <br /> those community center elements were scattered throughout both entities, whether <br /> in a school district or city facility, making the decision-making challenging at that <br /> time on whether or not to include a community center as a community priority. <br /> While the school district serves a larger area than the City of Roseville, Mayor <br /> Roe opined that the same constituency supported the community and should be <br /> continued, enhanced or added to for the good of all. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that was unique to Roseville and how it had ad- <br /> dressed the whole community center issue, was through a decentralized model <br /> with gathering spaces spread throughout the city. With other communities having <br /> more or better amenities than those offered in Roseville, Councilmember Willmus <br /> noted that they were now finding those facilities unsustainable and were partner- <br /> ing with other groups (e.g. City of Maplewood Community Center partnering <br /> with the Y) and asked if such a private/public model had been considered by the <br /> school district, not specifically for academic purposes but for community purpos- <br /> es. <br /> Board Chair Traynor reported that this had been a discussion of the Options <br /> Committee and consideration to centralizing resources at one site, including pools <br /> and gyms and having multiple ones at one location; and thus exploring partner- <br /> ships to support that larger option. However, Board Chair Traynor reported that <br /> the committee had decided not to go in that direction as they determined that <br /> those amenities should be offered at several sites for easier access throughout the <br /> community versus one centralized location. <br /> Also, Mayor Roe noted that, as a fully-developed city and school district, it would <br /> be challenging to find a site to accomplish such a centralized location. <br /> Ms. Thompson noted another challenge heard from the community and the Op- <br /> tions and Criteria Committees was the need to address the basics for school and <br /> community uses. While this may include a pool set at a warmer temperature for <br /> community use versus that of the swim team or for swim lessons, and gyms for <br /> both school and community use, Ms. Thompson noted the community was very <br /> clear on its preference for good value and basic programming. Therefore, Ms. <br /> Thompson opined that it didn't seem viable for the school district to seek out pri- <br /> vate partnership, since there wouldn't be a lot of opportunities for their use. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested looking at partnering with local non-profits that could help <br /> support programming at some point. <br />