My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0410
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2017 9:08:29 AM
Creation date
5/24/2017 9:06:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/10/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 10, 2017 <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />prepared to create this fund tonight without receiving their input and any suggest- <br />ed improvements. <br /> <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Finance Director Miller reported on <br />the context of Finance Commission discussions about this topic in the past four <br />months, with the sentiment by several commissioners that it seemed to create a <br />complex structure to get at what was available or appropriate for the next budget <br />cycle. Mr. Miller further reported on a nuance he had suggested as part of their <br />consideration and similar to his suggestion to the City Council tonight, was possi- <br />ble unintended consequences in taking away multi-year budgetary management <br />foci of departments and how that impacts today’s management or business mode l <br />with resources deferred or needed for tomorrow; ultimately changing how you <br />chose to manage those resources. Mr. Miller stated the need to have internal dis- <br />cussions with management staff and give that further consideration for long -range <br />budget management. <br /> <br />Councilmember Willmus opined that, in his viewing of Finance Commission <br />meetings and talking with individual commissioners, he found them quite su p- <br />portive of this and the ability to separately track those dollars from year to year. <br />Therefore, Councilmember Willmus advised that he would not support this mo- <br />tion to return to the Finance Commission; but would support a motion to create a <br />carryover fund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Laliberte sought clarification from Mr. Miller if his comments <br />indicated that department s would consider this as a warning to spend their money <br />before yearend to avoid losing carryover dollars. <br /> <br />Finance Director Miller clarified that his comments were in no way intended to be <br />taken that way; and clarified that currently department management evolved over <br />years, and if dollars weren’t available in one year, needs could perhaps be moved <br />to the next budget cycle. Therefore, Mr. Miller advised that his only concern, <br />without having talked to management staff to hear their perspectives, was that <br />such an action may create additional challenges not currently present, and have <br />consequences not yet identified without having those internal, staff-level discus- <br />sions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Etten stated that he would support the motion for more formal <br />discussion and recommendation from the Finance Commission. <br /> <br />While understanding that this had been discussed by the Finance Commission, <br />Mayor Roe advised that he was seeking a formal recommendation from them. <br /> <br />With Councilmember Laliberte noting the Finance Commission was scheduled to <br />meet tomorrow night, Mr. Miller suggested that in order for him to provide guid- <br />ance for the Commission on unanswered questions brought up tonight, those staff
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.