CC_Minutes_2017_0410 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, April 10, 2017 Page 6 Mayor Roe sought clarification as to whether there could be a check -in with the City Council after Task 1 if the City Council authorized all phases and prices as currently recommended in the RCA and attachments. Mr. Brokke clarified that the intent was to advertise for bids and return to the City Council at that time. Mayor Roe stated support for the reco mmended action if there was a check-in at the end of Task 1. Councilmember McGehee stated that she could not support the recommendation without a serious check-in to approve the design. Even though Councilmember Laliberte had been part of the Task Force, Councilmember McGehee opined that since this is being paid for with taxpayer monies, the City Council would be r e- miss without seeking public buy-in on the project before proceeding beyond that. Mr. Brokke advised that as many check-ins and updates could provided as di- rected by the City Council and at any time in the process while still keeping the project on track. Willmus moved, Etten seconded, approving a Professional Services Agreement (Attachment A) between the City of Roseville and Hagen, Christense n & McIl- wain Architects for services referenced in the document for replacement of the Cedarholm Golf Course Clubhouse Community Building at a cost not to exceed $146,200; authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the document; and authorizing advertisement for bids, with final City Attorney review and approv- al; amended as follows:  Staff is directed to schedule periodic check-ins along the way, not necessari- ly for formal action but for City Council review and possible redirection at that point; and  With agreement by the makers of the motion, directed staff to provide a def- inite check-in at the end of Task 1. Councilmember Etten stated that he was fine with a check-in but not with Mayor Roe’s proposed separation of the two phases. Councilmember Etten noted that the motion as amended would allow another chance for review but still keep the project moving forward to provide as little disruption as possible to services and programs at the golf course. As far as keeping the community involved, Cou n- cilmember Etten opined that they had been and will continue to be involved, and if at any time in the process they had any questions or comments, as long as the city continued keeping them informed, they could bring those to the City Cou n- cil’s attention at any time.