CC_Minutes_2016_11-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 14, 2016 Page 17 holder. Therefore, Mr. Miller stated he would strongly suggest that the City Council consider something slightly different than a one-year lease. Adding to that timing scenario, Councilmember Laliberte noted that everyone was of mind in expressing dissatisfaction with the current condition of the License Center. Therefore, Councilmember Laliberte opined that to just renew the lease and stay in the tight confines in the unwelcoming conditions at the Center was as equally undesirable. Councilmember Laliberte suggested that whether or not the city was amenable to staying in those same circumstances or what improvements it would consider with a short-term lease renewal also needed to be part of this conversation. Regarding the lease term, Councilmember Willmus stated he didn’t have strong feelings, but if the city was serious about property acquisition, the lease term would become moot at some point. Councilmember Willmus stated that he hoped that wouldn’t be as long as three years from now. Councilmember McGehee stated her agreement, but noted the need to balance the additional space needed at the current leased space and potential acquisition of a new site. Councilmember McGehee suggested that staff advise the City Council about what a two-year versus a three-year lease would lease and costs entailed. Finance Director Miller noted the good relationship between the city and building owners at the current leased site, with that relationship continuing over the last sixteen years. Mr. Miller clarified that while the relationship remained good be- tween the parties and they continued to be willing to work with the city on a short-term solution, at the end of the day the property owner was also a business person, and if the city pursues extending their space further south in the facility, it would displace the current tenant, with the city potentially liable for those reloca- tion costs for that tenant. Mr. Miller also noted there is room on the property to expand the facility north, with the city currently occupying the end cap of the fa- cility. However, Mr. Miller also noted that the potential expansion on the north end had been marketed by the property owner for over fifteen years, without seri- ous interest shown. If the city was to consider an expansion to the north, Mr. Mil- ler opined that he doubted the property owner would be interested in doing so for a two-year lease, since it would not provide them much incentive to speculate as to whether it could market the space to future tenants after the city’s two-year lease terminated and they moved to another facility. Therefore, Mr. Miller noted that the longer lease term, the more options and leverage staff could negotiate. Finance Director Miller recommended a minimum three year lease with an option to renew for an additional two years. Mr. Miller opined that this provided the city with a short-term solution, while providing significant motivation to get a long- term solution done within three years, with the two year option available to buy more time if and as needed.