My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0314_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_0314_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 1:39:47 PM
Creation date
7/14/2017 1:39:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />February 14, 2017 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Chair Schroeder stated the Commission had previously discussed adding a justification piece to 47 <br />the CIP for anything for a set dollar amount and/or near term items. This would also work well 48 <br />with the Commission’s recommendation to include a prioritization piece in the CIP language. 49 <br /> 50 <br />It was the consensus of the Finance Commission to have a justification section included with CIP 51 <br />items. 52 <br /> 53 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the format should be impactful but not create too much 54 <br />additional work. 55 <br /> 56 <br />Commissioner Murray asked what staff’s thoughts were about adding a justification piece. 57 <br /> 58 <br />Finance Director Miller stated that there has been some discussion about adding additional 59 <br />narrative but he had not asked specifically about the work load that would be involved with 60 <br />compiling this information. The City had done separate justifications for large items in the past 61 <br />but stopped doing this because it was not being used by the Council. 62 <br /> 63 <br />Commissioner Murray stated this could create more information than the Council would want or 64 <br />need in order to make decisions on the CIP. 65 <br /> 66 <br />Chair Schroeder stated the CIP is coming up for discussion and review. A justification can be 67 <br />included in either the initial review and approval or prior to the Council approving the 68 <br />expenditure during the year. 69 <br /> 70 <br />Commissioner Harold stated he would see this as being a part of the annual CIP approval and not 71 <br />included as part of the Council meeting packets. 72 <br /> 73 <br />Finance Director Miller stated the CIP is a plan for the year and everything over $5000 in the 74 <br />CIP will be brought back to the Council for a secondary approval at individual Council meetings. 75 <br />At this time the item is highlighted and there is discussion about the need for replacement and 76 <br />why. 77 <br /> 78 <br />Commissioner Zeller suggested the Finance Commission review the CIP in May and if there are 79 <br />items they feel should be justified they could request this additional information be included 80 <br />when it goes to the City Council. There are items in the CIP that are well documented and the 81 <br />City knows they need to be replaced. These should not require any additional work or 82 <br />justification but if there are items that trigger questions by the Finance Commission then they 83 <br />could get additional information or justifications from staff. 84 <br /> 85 <br />Finance Director Miller asked how this information would be used in the Commission’s advisory 86 <br />capacity to the Council. 87 <br /> 88 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated if the City decides to start prioritizing items then the additional 89 <br />information would be useful in determining if these items meet the criteria. 90 <br /> 91
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.