My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0411_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_0411_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 1:40:00 PM
Creation date
7/14/2017 1:39:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM 1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />DATE: August 25, 20114 <br />5 <br />TO: City Manager Bill Malinen6 <br />7 <br />FROM: Chief Rick Mathwig8 <br />9 <br />SUBJECT: Forfeiture Information10 <br />11 <br />This memorandum is in response to Mayor Roe’s request for a report related to questions raised 12 <br />by a citizen.13 <br />14 <br />Property seized and ultimately forfeited by the Roseville Police Department is governed by15 <br />Minnesota statutes: 169A.63 as it pertains to vehicle forfeitures for aggravated drunk driving16 <br />arrests, and 609.531 as it pertains to vehicle and property seized for designated offenses17 <br />such as narcotics, burglary, and other crimes.18 <br />19 <br />Other property forfeited by the Police Department, not governed by Minnesota statutes, is20 <br />generally related to our narcotics officer assigned to the Ramsey County’s Violent Crime21 <br />Enforcement Team (VCET). A percentage of their forfeitures are in concert with federal22 <br />agencies such as the DEA. Those forfeitures are under the direction of federal laws which23 <br />are similar to those in Minnesota .24 <br />25 <br />Each Minnesota statute contains numerous subdivisions which strictly control forfeitures26 <br />and the appeal processes afforded to those whose property is seized by law enforcement.27 <br />28 <br />Upon seizure of property to be forfeited the owner is issued a receipt for the property and is29 <br />issued written documentation on how to contest the seizure in court. This information is30 <br />written in multiple languages and the law enforcement agency must be certain the person31 <br />understands the seizure and the appeal process or the seizure will be considered invalid.32 <br />33 <br />Once property has been legally seized and forfeited state statutes dictate how the proceeds34 <br />should be dispersed. This process differs among crimes, but involving aggravated DWI35 <br />offenses, the law enforcement agency retains seventy percent of the proceeds and thirty36 <br />percent is forwarded to the prosecuting attorney. For crimes involving narcotics, burglary,37 <br />etc., percentages differ but in general the law enforcement agency retains seventy percent38 <br />of the proceeds, twenty percent is forwarded to the prosecuting attorney and the remaining39 <br />ten percent is sent to the State of Minnesota’s Crime Victim’s Fund .40 <br />41 <br />The Minnesota Peace Officers Standards and Training Board (POST) is the state entity that42 <br />holds all professional licenses of peace officers in Minnesota. POST provides many43 <br />functions one of which is offering model policies based on best practices in law44 <br />enforcement. Some of the model policies are considered mandatory; Procession of Property 45 <br />Seized for Administrative Forfeiture is a required policy of all law enforcement agencies in46 <br />Minnesota. The model policy was implemented in 2011. The model policy did not change our47 <br />forfeiture operations in any significant manner.48 <br />49 <br />Minnesota statutes mandate every forfeiture be reported to the Office of the State Auditor.50 <br />Item #7: Attachment A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.