My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0411_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_0411_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 1:40:00 PM
Creation date
7/14/2017 1:39:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The citizen’s questions raised to the Council are directly related to the now defunct Gang Strike51 <br />Force and not my Department. I do not have intimate details of the Gang Strike Force’s former52 <br />operations but what has been established is some members of the Gang Strike Force53 <br />disregarded state and federal statutes which dictate the process of seizing and ultimately54 <br />forfeiting property from suspects in criminal activity.55 <br />56 <br />These web links will allow access to expanded information on forfeiture guidelines and57 <br />regulations.58 <br />59 <br />Forfeitures related to aggravated DWI offenses:60 <br />https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169A.6361 <br />62 <br />Forfeitures related to other crimes: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609.531 63 <br />64 <br />Model policies of POST: https://dps.mn.gov/entity/post/model-policies-learning-65 <br />objectives/Pages/default.aspx66 <br />67 <br />The citizen’s questions also address the expenditure of forfeiture funds. State statutes mandate68 <br />the funds are to be used to “supplement” law enforcement ’s activities and budgets. Historically,69 <br />the Department has used forfeited funds related to aggravated DWI offenses to supplement its70 <br />efforts in combating DWI. The Department has used forfeited funds related to other crimes in a71 <br />more general sense in supplementing budgetary limitations. Many times expenses related to the72 <br />Roseville members of East Metro SWAT are paid by this forfeiture account.73 <br />74 <br />All expenditures are authorized by the Chief of Police and paid by the Finance Department.75 <br />76 <br />There is no manner to realistically forecast expected expenditures of these accounts as77 <br />forfeiture statutes mandate the funds be used to “supplement” the financial needs of a law 78 <br />enforcement agency and not replace budgetary funding.79 <br />80 <br />The forfeiture accounts have been used to bridge the CIP shortfall and actual needs of the81 <br />Department in effectively and efficiently providing public safety functions to the citizens,82 <br />businesses and visitors to Roseville.83 <br />84 <br />There are many day to day operational items that have been purchased by these funds to85 <br />include: automobile window tint meters, Tasers, legal defense related to forfeitures which is86 <br />outside the contract of the city attorney, preliminary alcohol breath test meters, over $100,00087 <br />was used to purchase the Department’s current mobile computers, Police Reserve appreciation88 <br />dinner, and many other uses. I expect future expenditures will be similar to the past.89 <br />90 <br />I hope this memorandum provides enough guidance on the criminal forfeiture process and am91 <br />willing to answer additional questions.92 <br />93 <br />Item #7: Attachment A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.