Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Minutes – Wednesday, June 28, 2017 <br />Page 10 <br />minimum units. The yield factor shows that it is important to have a minimum <br />415 <br />residential requirement in districts so that it can be included in the calculations. <br />416 <br />417 <br />Chair Murphy inquiredwhat the current numbers are for affordable housing <br />418 <br />compared to the Metropolitan Council requirement. <br />419 <br />420 <br />Ms. Collins responded the City is required to identify housing programs and tools <br />421 <br />they offer to the Metropolitan Council, and they provide a score of how the City is <br />422 <br />doing with affordable housing opportunities. This has been between 90 and 100 <br />423 <br />percent for the last couple of years. Roseville has very limited vacant land and <br />424 <br />that is why they are looking at redevelopment in areas that mayaccommodate <br />425 <br />multifamily housing. <br />426 <br />427 <br />Ms. Perdu reported Roseville is classified as Urban. The eight units per acre is the <br />428 <br />minimum density requirement throughout the metro area. <br />429 <br />430 <br />Member Bull clarified the numbers showthey should provide an additional 72 <br />431 <br />units of affordable housing for people that are making less than $24,000 in <br />432 <br />income. <br />433 <br />434 <br />Ms. Perdu responded the portion below 50 percent area median income (AMI) has <br />435 <br />to be at a higher density than 8 units per acre. It is required to be 12 units per acre, <br />436 <br />but the City’s high-densitycategory already meets the minimum. <br />437 <br />438 <br />Meeting Forecasts <br />439 <br />Roseville’spopulation isprojected to gain about 840 people and 1,477 households <br />440 <br />through 2040. The household sizes with be going down, and the new housing that <br />441 <br />is going to be developed will be multi-family, which means less people per <br />442 <br />household. This is very common in the urban and inner ring suburbs of the <br />443 <br />Metropolitan Council. <br />444 <br />445 <br />Member Gitzen stated he recalledthe projected number of households to be <br />446 <br />around 600. Ms. Perdu stated she will look into it. <br />447 <br />448 <br />Ms. Perdu explained the Plan Yield is how many households and how much <br />449 <br />population the City could yield from development and redevelopment. It includes <br />450 <br />the available acres, programmed density, and projected persons per household. <br />451 <br />452 <br />Ms. Perdu reported the City meets the population projection and is slightly under <br />453 <br />the forecast for the number of households. One wayto increase the number of <br />454 <br />developable households would be to increase the areas designated as <br />455 <br />redevelopment. The City has more housing projected that people projected, and <br />456 <br />the Metropolitan Council assumes that new development is going to be for <br />457 <br />smaller households. <br />458 <br />459 <br />Member Daire commented the 2010 census figures for population and household <br />460 <br />shows there are 2.3 persons per household. The 2040 plan shows there to be 2.14 <br />461 <br /> <br />