Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Minutes – Wednesday, June 28, 2017 <br />Page 12 <br />Member Kimble referred to the redevelopment site located south of County Road <br />508 <br />C and east of Snelling, and inquired if that site could be Medium Density instead <br />509 <br />of Low Density. <br />510 <br />511 <br />Mr. Paschke responded it potentially could, but the wetland area is fairly large <br />512 <br />andthere would be an issue with access. <br />513 <br />514 <br />Ms. Perdu provided a scenario where they could increase theminimum Medium <br />515 <br />Density to six, the minimum High Density to 18, and the minimum Neighborhood <br />516 <br />Center and Community Mixed Use minimums to six to achieve the required <br />517 <br />density of 10 units per acre. <br />518 <br />519 <br />Member Daire suggested they keepMedium Density and Neighborhood at four, <br />520 <br />High Density at 12, and change the Community Mixed Use to10. <br />521 <br />522 <br />Ms. Perdu suggested they put Medium Density at five, High Density at 13, <br />523 <br />Neighborhood Center at four, and Community Mixed Use at 10. <br />524 <br />525 <br />Member Kimble commented she likesthis scenario better based on the <br />526 <br />description of Community Mixed Use. <br />527 <br />528 <br />Member Daire inquired if this meets the 1,477 required households. Ms. Perdu <br />529 <br />stated that number will also include Low Density Residential, and with the <br />530 <br />additional area they are close. <br />531 <br />532 <br />Member Kimble and Chair Murphy stated they like Member Daire’s suggestion. <br />533 <br />534 <br />Mr. Lloyd pointed out that Low Density Residential could have up to eight <br />535 <br />dwelling units per acre, as stated in its description, which helps in the calculation. <br />536 <br />537 <br />Chair Murphy requested comments from staff regarding the new numbers they <br />538 <br />proposed. <br />539 <br />540 <br />Mr. Lloyd responded adjusting the minimum is immaterial because developers <br />541 <br />generally want to do as much as possible. <br />542 <br />543 <br />Ms. Paschke agreed they are typically at or near maximums, not minimums. <br />544 <br />545 <br />The Commission agreed they were comfortable with the following minimums: <br />546 <br />Medium Density Residential at five, High Density Residential at 13, <br />547 <br />Neighborhood Center at five, and Community Mixed Use at 10. <br />548 <br />549 <br />Ms. Perdu advised she will redo the maps and update the numbers based on <br />550 <br />discussion and provide an update at the next meeting. There will be a HarMar <br />551 <br />Walkabout on July 20, and an EDA work session on July18. At their next <br />552 <br />meeting on July 26, they will have final concepts for land use, ideas for the <br />553 <br />special study areas, and begin discussion on housing. <br />554 <br /> <br />