Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 10, 2017 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> i. Review 2017-2018 Policy Priority Planning Document <br /> As detailed in the RCA, City Manager Trudgeon briefly reviewed this latest itera- <br /> tion (Attachment C) of the Policy Priority Planning (PPP) document for the City <br /> Council's consideration for adoption. Mr. Trudgeon noted the draft continued <br /> prior formatting and past input; and covered 2017 - 2018. <br /> Councilmember Etten expressed appreciation for the more realistic two-year ap- <br /> proach for this document. <br /> In the "Inclusive" priority, Councilmember Etten asked if participation in the <br /> Government Alliance on Race and Equity Program (GARE) should instead say <br /> "including GARE" since there may be other policies in addition to that. <br /> While not opposing such a language change, City Manager Trudgeon noted that <br /> GARE provided a framework to look through, thus the proposed language to re- <br /> view and consider inclusive city policies and procedures "through" possible par- <br /> ticipation in GARE. In case the city chooses not to participate, Mr. Trudgeon <br /> noted that the city needed a"Plan B." <br /> Councilmember Etten duly noted staff's rationale and agreed with proposed lan- <br /> guage as presented. <br /> With the new Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission (HRIEC), <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that they definitely wanted to be involved in <br /> some of these priorities. Councilmember Laliberte noted that in the past the City <br /> Council had talked about involvement but frequently initiatives were off and run- <br /> ning without providing advisory commissions with a place in the process, leaving <br /> them frustrated. With several commissions listed in the "responsible"parties col- <br /> umn, Councilmember Laliberte suggested that the City Council consider having <br /> the HRIEC review the GARE process and bring forward their recommendations <br /> to the City Council before moving forward without their input. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte also noted the current work of the newly-created Imag- <br /> ine Roseville community efforts; and while not a commission and under the aus- <br /> pices of the City Council, noted that it was a planning committee even though <br /> those involved had not been clearly and publicly identified. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte suggested more transparency identifying those involved, when and <br /> where they meet, and how decision-making was done, as well as topics to be dis- <br /> cussed as they went forward without involving the City Council. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte admitted that she continued to struggle with that group's process and of- <br /> ficial status. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested referring both processes through the Human Rights, Inclu- <br /> sion and Engagement Commission (HRIEC). Mayor Roe clarified that initially <br />