Laserfiche WebLink
REDA Meeting <br /> Minutes—Tuesday,July 18,2017 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Affordable Housing <br /> With a total of 142 affordable housing units needed to meet the Metropolitan <br /> Council's allocation for the City of Roseville, Ms. Purdu advised that as the <br /> process continued, that policy discussion would come forward during the <br /> "Housing" chapter requirements to include residential as part of mixed use <br /> designations. However, if the REDA chose to remove that housing component <br /> from mixed uses, Ms. Purdu advised that it would change these calculations <br /> accordingly. <br /> President Roe stated that he found Ms. Purdu's previous explanation helpful in <br /> understanding the rationale to include that housing component for mixed uses. <br /> Specific to the affordable housing requirement of the Metropolitan Council, <br /> President Roe clarified that those goals simply indicated that the city had the <br /> capacity to allow it to be built, not that it required to have it built by 2040, but <br /> to plan for that capability. <br /> If housing requirements were removed for mixed use designated areas, <br /> Member Etten asked if the Metropolitan Council would count HDR minimum <br /> units. <br /> Ms. Purdu responded that the city would be fine even if removing Community <br /> Mixed Use (CMU) housing components; as the Metropolitan Council was <br /> looking to the fact that the city had the available land and density to provide an <br /> opportunity for developers. Ms. Purdu advised that the problem was with the <br /> table of land use types on Attachment A (page 3). <br /> At the request of Member McGehee, Ms. Purdu explained the density <br /> requirement and how it was integrally linked to affordable housing allocations. <br /> Ms. Purdu reviewed her theory of the Metropolitan Council's in calculating <br /> community development further out in the region versus smaller lot sizes and <br /> reasonable units that could be built, with different types of housing that could <br /> be considered affordable, including single family units on their own individual <br /> lots. <br /> As an example, Member McGehee asked, if the city chose to develop a 3-4 <br /> acre site and populated it with mobile or mini homes perhaps at eight per acre, <br /> would they count toward affordable housing requirements. <br /> Ms. Purdu responded affirmatively. <br /> President Roe clarified that the Metropolitan Council counted the actual <br /> number of affordable units planning for a density so it could be affordable, <br /> with credit given no matter what the density, based on the planning approach <br /> and actual affordable units available. <br />