2017-02-22_PC_Packet-CompPlan - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission –Comprehensive Plan Update Minutes –Wednesday, January 25, 2017 Page 9 the process of the comprehensive plan update going forward, but not the Imagine 309 Roseville 2025 document itself or any revisions to that document. 310 Mr. Paschke concurred, noting that consideration should be given to how those 311 goals are supported or not supported at this point and in the updated 312 comprehensive plan going forward. While those goals shaped the previous 313 comprehensive plan, Mr. Paschke noted the need to determine those that remained 314 pertinent or needing tweaked; with all the different chapters of the comprehensive 315 plan having goals addressed accordingly. 316 At the request of Member Daire, Ms. Perduadvised that an outline of the 317 comprehensive plan in draft form was not yet updated. Member Daire opined that 318 he would need to review that in order to do the job laid out before the 319 commission; opining that it was important to know what is or is not in the 320 comprehensive plan to judge whether or not it remained relative or had 321 implications. 322 Ms. Perdue noted that the outline as it currently exists for the 2040 plan is 323 outlined in the Table of Contents that had been distributed at the last Planning 324 Commission meeting and provided general goals and content. 325 Mr. Lloyd concurred, noting that the Table of Contents identified chapters of the 326 2040 comprehensive plan related to major topic areas, but at this point in the 327 process didn’t provide any content of those major topic areas. 328 Member Daire suggested that it was then conceivable that some of these 329 statements are general and can remain because they includethings such as, “make 330 Roseville a livable community for all;” with everything in the comprehensive plan 331 devoted to that goal. 332 Mr. Lloyd stated that while the city and community in general had been working 333 toward that as a sample goal, opinions may vary asto how successful that effort 334 had been so far, even though it remains a goal. Mr. Lloyd suggested that may be 335 the type of statement or goal showing up in various chapters (e.g. land use, parks 336 & recreation, housing and neighborhoods). 337 Chair Boguszewski suggested that things such as “define livable” and associated 338 metrics, some attempt be made for a more measurable definition. 339 Mr. Paschke agreed that each of those respective chapters could define “livable” 340 in that specific realm. 341 Ms. Perduagreed that was agood point, how to measure the goal and indicators 342 one way or the other. If looking at the goal of livability as an example, Ms. Perdu 343 suggested keeping it not only in the general goal category, but also in each 344 chapter, since each may mean something different, but would essentially tie into 345 the overall goal and which policies would support it. 346