Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission –Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Minutes –Wednesday, January 25, 2017 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted that, while most of the questions and thoughts identified <br />269 <br />by the Commission seemed to be random thoughts and loose threads, the intent of <br />270 <br />the table and how the engagement plan had now been formulated appeared to <br />271 <br />reflect those priorities. Chair Boguszewski thanked the City Council for <br />272 <br />approving it and allowing things to move forward. <br />273 <br />Ms. Perduadvised that the timeline would continue to evolve as more detail for <br />274 <br />community engagement was approved by the City Council, with an updated <br />275 <br />version available at the next Planning Commission meeting. As Mr. Lloyd noted <br />276 <br />earlier in his comments, Ms. Perduadvised that the plan was to provide a quick <br />277 <br />snapshot or the current month and upcoming events, being constantly updated. <br />278 <br />Ms. Perdunoted that the March Special Planning Commission meeting would <br />279 <br />provide the results of the public kick-off meeting. <br />280 <br />Further discussion included publishing the timeline on the website in the near <br />281 <br />future; including a brief history and revisions dates available online for the public <br />282 <br />to remain aware of the dynamics of the timeline; and delays in getting the <br />283 <br />information online until it had been finalized earlier this week by the City <br />284 <br />Council. <br />285 <br />Member Bull noted that future communication between the consultant, staff and <br />286 <br />the Planning Commission as steering committee needed to be updated for <br />287 <br />schedules and any adjustments in order to provide guidance on where things are <br />288 <br />and what’s happening. <br />289 <br />b.Task l: Review of Vision and Goals <br />290 <br />Ms. Perdunoted the goals that had been identified by the homework assignment, <br />291 <br />serving as a starting point to move forward with the focus; with staff having <br />292 <br />collected and compiledindividual responses,and the consultant having prepared a <br />293 <br />discussion of those responses. <br />294 <br />If tonight’s goal is not reflective of those comments, Member Murphy asked if <br />295 <br />that was their last shot at input on the goals. <br />296 <br />Ms. Perduemphatically stated that it was not, and was intended only as the first <br />297 <br />shot. Ms. Perduadvised that her goal for tonight was to get a general consensus of <br />298 <br />any modifications the body saw in any set of goals. Ms. Perduadvised that she <br />299 <br />would then take that information and return with them –as revised –for the next <br />300 <br />meeting with vetting by city staff and the public in the meantime. <br />301 <br />Mr. Lloyd referenced the cover memo provided with the homework (dated <br />302 <br />January 13, 2017) defining the goals and not within any realm of editing the <br />303 <br />Imagine Roseville 2025 community visioning process. <br />304 <br />As requested by Member Daire, Mr. Lloyd clarified that the wording in the <br />305 <br />second column of the spreadsheet provided as the homework assignment were <br />306 <br />direct statements of the goals of the Imagine Roseville 2025 document. Mr. Lloyd <br />307 <br />further clarified that the intent was to reconsider how those statements informed <br />308 <br /> <br />