2017-02-22_PC_Packet-CompPlan - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission –Comprehensive Plan Update Minutes –Wednesday, January 25, 2017 Page 11 For further elaboration, Member Cunningham suggested different types of 385 businesses beyond chains (e.g. restaurants and/or stores) allowing for more 386 diversity as the city encourages non-chain type businesses. 387 From the Planning Commission’s perspective, related to policies and practices, 388 Chair Boguszewski noted the different customer segments (e.g. four star 389 restaurant versus a food truck). 390 Member Murphy noted his confusion as to what was meant by being a “regional 391 leader in creative and sustainable areas” or what “early adopter” meant and how 392 or where it was applicable. 393 Member Gitzen noted that the “regional” category was the only place it showed 394 up in the entire document; and if applied there, it could also be applied to other 395 spots as well; statinghis agreement with Member Murphy. 396 Member Daire questioned if “regional leadership” was something Roseville 397 wanted to be or already is and wanted to maintain that status; or it wasn’t but 398 sought to achieve it. 399 When the Imagine Roseville 2025 visioning process occurred, Mr. Lloyd 400 suggested that it was established as a goal; with some of those ideas felt strongly 401 about by residents that they felt had been achieved by Roseville, achieved well 402 and should remain as a goal. Mr. Lloyd suggested others may be perceived as not 403 yet accomplished or as newly-articulated goals. Mr. Lloyd clarified that the job of 404 the Commission at this point was how to interpret those goals (e.g. business 405 diversity) moving forward and how that informed the plan update. 406 Ms. Perdusuggested that the wording of the goal itself should provide some 407 indication as to what degree it has or has not been achieved, whether or not the 408 wording may need changed going forward; or what was needed to achieve the 409 goal and steps in the comprehensive plan orany other document to achieve the 410 goal. 411 Member Bull noted that as Mr. Lloyd alluded to “perceived” it could simply mean 412 as a goal that Roseville was “perceived” as a regional leader, a goal. 413 Member Bull asked what was intended by “quality of life.” 414 Ms. Perduagreed that there were many measurable ways to define that, and threw 415 the question back to the Commission for how they would measure whether the 416 city was moving in that direction or not. 417 Chair Boguszewski opined that, with implementation of the community vision, 418 Roseville had done a lot in achieving its goals over the last ten years. 419 By consensus, Commissioners agreed, noting that while in process, it also 420 remained a goal. 421 Ms. Perduasked if the Commission wanted to be more detailed in its goals or 422 whengetting into specific implementation of them. 423