My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0115_ET_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Minutes
>
2002_0115_ET_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 3:54:11 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 3:54:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Ethics Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Coversheet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2) Authority to issue advisory opinions <br /> <br />3)Regularly scheduled meetings <br /> <br />4)Letter to City Council to meet and propose changes <br />to the Resolution <br /> <br /> <br />3.Propose Joint Meeting with the City Council <br />a. Offer recommended changes to the Resolution, then meet, <br />b. Meet first and Chair communicates interest to participate in the review <br /> request to revise Resolution <br />1) If yes, meet and discuss changes <br />2) Recommend changes to the City Council <br />c. Or, request a meeting with City Council <br />1) At work session <br /> 2) And meet before or after Resolution revised <br /> <br /> <br />4.Subpoena power: Resolution modified that if a person fails to respond – <br />finding of non-cooperation <br /> <br /> <br />5.Review Ethical Considerations – Section 3 of Resolution <br /> <br /> <br />6. Examine the procedures when a complaint comes to the Commission – <br />-more specifics -- Ombudsman <br />-“What relief is sought? <br />-more focus and save time <br /> <br /> <br />7.Ethical considerations -- where does lobbying fall? <br /> <br /> 8. Who’s a qualified Ethics Commissioner (i.e., St. Paul, MN but political involvement)? <br /> <br />9. Clarify term limit issue <br /> <br />10. Ethical Consideration – “not be contrary to the best interest of the City” <br /> Should be clear and not too general. <br /> <br />11. Limit the length of an investigation <br /> <br />12. Role of Commission should be: Advisory, educational, investigative, <br />adjudicative, enforcement and report to the enabling body <br /> <br />Battis made the motion requesting the Chair to contact the City Council in terms <br />of whether to proceed with revisions to the Ethics Resolution and if they can give <br />us the authority to meet and whether they want to meet with us in a work session <br />to discuss those changes and how to do it if they authorize us to move ahead with <br />it. Seconded by Richard Langseth. All Ayes Opposed – None <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.