My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0115_ET_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Minutes
>
2002_0115_ET_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 3:54:11 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 3:54:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Ethics Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Coversheet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Butterfield also reported that the annual mailing of Disclosure of Financial Interests <br />statements was coming to a close. This is a requirement of the Ethics Code and the <br />statements are sent on an annual basis to all those subject to the requirement and should <br />reply by January 30. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />II. REVIEW MEETING SUMMARY OF FACILITATED <br />DISCUSSION OF 10/31/01 <br />Butterfield reviewed the 10/31/01 meeting discussion with the Commission. She <br />reminded the Commission that they had ended the session with the discussion of how to <br />turn weaknesses into strengths. The Commission was directed to refer to the sample <br />enabling language and rules of procedure for other municipal Ethics Commissions. <br /> <br />Based upon the Commission’s characterizations of the Strengths and Weaknesses -- What <br />will be the Commission’s Work Plan? <br /> <br /> <br />A.Training: Orientation for Commission of scope and benchmarks <br /> <br />B.Ethics Commission Options: Enabling language (how authorized, what are roles <br />and responsibilities) <br /> <br />C.Joint Meeting with the City Council <br />1. City Council expectations <br />2. Present options and role <br /> <br />D.Clarify Commission and Staff Role (schedule regular meeting once a <br /> Complaint is filed). <br /> <br />E.Resources: Budget ($3,500 for 2002), samples in packet for Commission to have <br />subpoena authority, expectations tied to City Council as it relates to alignment and <br />the advisory responsibility. <br /> <br />The Commission specifically discussed the following items require discussion and <br />review: <br /> <br /> <br />1.Orientation Packet (for New Members): The Commission holds a meeting <br />when new members are appointed. <br />a. Resolution <br /> <br />b.Complaint procedure <br />1) Review complaint procedures with examples of issues that apply to <br /> Commission scope and those that don’t <br /> 2) Review complaint challenges, limits, and pitfalls <br /> <br /> <br />2.Resolution Review: <br />a. Clarify intent of Paragraph 4, Page 5, Item A <br />b. Membership 3-5 <br />c. Schedule another meeting so that Commissioners can provide ideas in <br /> writing, such as: <br />1) Closed session of the Ethics Commission (i.e., evaluate the role of cable <br /> and how it effect the discussion and information provided in a meeting) <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.