My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-10-3_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2017
>
2017-10-3_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 1:59:22 PM
Creation date
9/28/2017 1:59:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />1 <br />DRAFT MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />2 <br />September5, 20176:30pm <br />3 <br />4 <br />PRESENT: <br />5Baggenstoss,Bole, Gelbach,Heikkila, Hoag,Newby, O’Brien,Stoner, <br />6Warzecha <br />ABSENT: <br />7None <br />STAFF: <br />8Brokke,Christensen <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />INTRODUCTIONS <br />121. <br />13 <br />ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />142. <br />15No public in attendance. <br />16 <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES –AUGUST 3,2017MEETING <br />173. <br />18Commissioner Stoner requested amending line 129 to “no minimum property sizerequired <br />19for a beehive”. Commissioner Baggenstoss requested a change in line 54 from “would” to <br />20“could”. Commissioner Hoagmovedto approvethe August3, 2017 meeting minuteswith <br />21amendments. Commissioner Stonerseconds. Motion passedunanimously. <br />22 <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN –MASTER PLAN REVIEW AND UPDATE –SECTIONS <br />234. <br />5, 6 AND 7 <br />24 <br />25Goals1, 2, 3 and 4 werecompleted at previous Parks and Recreation Commission Meetings. <br />26 <br />Goal 5 Review <br />27 <br />28Chair Gelbach suggestedto add“adverse ethnic groups” toGoal5.1. <br />29 <br />30Commissioner Baggenstossrecommended adding,“seeking out those with little or no voice” <br />31toGoal5.4. <br />32 <br />33Commissioner Stoner suggestedincorporatingpossibilities outside of art heritage itemsto <br />34Goal5.3by adding “historical artifacts”after “Exhibit quality works of art”. <br />35 <br />Goal 6 Review <br />36 <br />37The Commissiondiscussed the reference toacommunity center in Goal 6.4,andhow that <br />38potential opportunity has changed historically. <br />39 <br />40Commissioner Stoner suggested reordering the structure of Goal 6.4 to include “define a <br />41strategy and identify a site”. <br />42 <br />Goal 7 Review <br />43 <br />44Chair Gelbach questionedGoal7.5and thereference ofthreeWatersheds. Heaskedif there <br />45should be four Watersheds.There were threein Rosevilleto staff knowledge, but it will be <br />46confirmed. <br />47 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.