My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_1112_Ethics Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Packets
>
2014_1112_Ethics Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 9:06:44 AM
Creation date
10/10/2017 10:46:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Ethics Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Conflicts <br />Conflicts of interest in local government are just a subset of our daily conflicts. We have <br />conflicts ainong our oblibations all the time. Our obligations are based on our personal and <br />professional relationships. We can only fulfill our obligations to our children and our <br />spouse, our parents and our siblings, our employer, partners, clients, customers, and other <br />business associates, and our relati�res, friends, pets, and neighbors at the expense of our <br />other obligations, inclucling our obligations to ourselves. We are constantly juggling these <br />obligations, and those to whom we have obligations are constantly disappointed in us <br />because of the priorities we set among our obligations. These priorities are necessitated by <br />our limited time and energy. <br />Juggling obligations goes beyond the constant schedulinb and prioritizing of our time. <br />There are expectations placed on us, and we are pressured — lobbied, influenced — by <br />everyone in our lives to give them and their interests a higher priority. All these people feel <br />they have a right to our time and attention, and there are no rules to help us decide which to <br />sho�v preference to or to what extent. <br />One good thing about government ethics is that it has a central rule: that no <br />preferential treatment should be shown. Contractors must be selected by competitive <br />bidding. Of$cials cannot hire their relatives. Nor can friends be given access to public works <br />equipment unless everyone can. Considering government ethics from the point of view of <br />preferential treatment shows ho�v important fairness is to bovernment ethics. The public <br />must be assured that decisions are made f'airly, excludinb no one simply due to a lack of <br />connections, especially when it comes to jobs, contracts, and the use of the community's <br />equipment and spaces. <br />Obligations, and the relationships on which they are based, work like stress does in <br />our bodies. They don't cause the disease of corruption, but they do help undermine our <br />immune system. Our natural selfishness is strenb hened when we can tell ourselves that we <br />are helping our family, friends, and business associates live a better life. Just as stress <br />increases our susceptibility to disease, oblibations increase our susceptibilit�- to acting <br />unethically with respect to the public, to putting our oblibations to others ahead of our <br />obligations to the public. <br />Conflicts are based on obligations, or perceived obligations. Conflicts that are not <br />dealt with responsibly create stress in the relationship between a local bovernment and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.