My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0920_HRIEC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission
>
Packets
>
2017
>
2017_0920_HRIEC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:09:08 PM
Creation date
10/10/2017 3:09:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />DAY 2 <br />ipate in any voluntary immigration <br />process was attended by approximately 40 <br />enforcement activities <br />people and held at the Roseville Skating <br />4. If the City SHOULD NOT have a policy, <br />roundtable discussions regarding possible <br />what, if anything should the City do in <br />actions that the city could consider. <br />relation to immigration enforcement <br />eville III featured round table <br />issues? <br />discussions among residents <br />from Mayor Dan Roe and opening remarks <br />regarding current and future <br />governing the structure of the evening by <br />5. What should individuals or groups in <br />City policy <br />facilitator Marquita Stephens. Participants <br />the community do in relation to immi- <br />were directed to discuss what they wanted <br />gration enforcement issues <br />to recommend, if anything, and why. <br />Two persons were not able to attend and <br />sent emails documenting their positions. <br />questions were: <br />table wrote their recommendation and re- <br />1. Should the City have a policy related to <br />lated comments and submitted them to the <br />what role the City will or will not take in <br />facilitator at the conclusion of the evening. <br />voluntary immigration enforcement? <br />an attachment to this report. All attendees <br />2. Why should the City have/not have <br />voted for a separation ordinance with one <br />such a policy? <br />abstention. <br />3. If the City SHOULD have a policy, what <br />should the policy say? A range of exam- <br />ples of possible policies includes: <br />Evaluations and general commentary indi- <br />cated the vast majority of those attending <br />and all opportunities to engage in <br />believed they received the information they <br />voluntary immigration enforcement <br />sought, and not only was the panel quite <br />activities <br />informative but it also allayed some of their <br />fears. <br />Interest in this issue extends to the greater <br />to certain requests from the Federal <br />community because Roseville is home to the <br />government to voluntarily assist in <br />Rosedale Mall and other large retail outlets <br />immigration enforcement activities. <br />frequented by those living outside Roseville. <br />(If so, which types of requests should <br />the City accept, and which should the <br />have children in the school district or shop <br />City not accept?) <br />in Roseville want to know whether po- <br />lice-involved disturbances will increase and <br />what kind of activity could those passing <br />pate in certain voluntary immigration <br />through Roseville expect to encounter if <br />enforcement activities (Indicate which <br />immigration enforcement practices change. <br />activities) <br />| 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.