CC_Minutes_2017_0925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 25, 2017 Page 21 As an alumnus of the University of Northwestern, and offering a synopsis of her personal involvement with the City of Roseville and University of Northwestern, Ms. Madison spoke in support of the requested PUD amendment. Meagan Struck, 570 Sandhurst Drive NW As an alumnus of the University of Northwestern, Ms. Everson Struck spoke in support of the requested PUD amendment. Benjamin Struck, 570 Sandhurst Drive NW Written comments also provided(no date available). As an alumni of the University of Northwestern's bio/chemistry program, Mr. Struck personally addressed the needed expansion of their lab and facilities; speaking in support of the requested PUD amendment. Brad Sickler, 2771 Woodbridge Street As an alumnus of the University of Northwestern, and offering a synopsis of his personal involvement with the City of Roseville and University of Northwestern, Mr. Sickler spoke in support of the requested PUD amendment. Mark Seignnus, 702 Wheaton Avenue As an alumnus of the University of Northwestern, and offering a synopsis of his personal involvement with the City of Roseville and University of Northwestern, Mr. Seignnus spoke in support of the requested PUD amendment as another step in improving the quality of life in Roseville. Nancy Kirby, 1708 Stanbridge Avenue Ms. Kirby offered a synopsis of her personal involvement with the City of Rose- ville and quality of students coming from the University of Northwestern, Ms. Madison spoke in support of the requested PUD amendment. Lois Gulbranson, 1159 Karyl Place Written comments also provided via email dated August 11, 2017. As an alumnus of the University of Northwestern, and offering a synopsis of her personal involvement with the City of Roseville and University of Northwestern, Ms. Madison spoke in 100% support of the requested PUD amendment by the University. Mayor Roe thanked speakers for their comments; and responded to questions raised during those comments. Mayor Roe reviewed notifications requirement (500') by the city for the property in question, noting that it was in a commercial versus residential area, and ques- tioned if notice could have been provided any differently than prescribed by city code.