My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0925
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 11:11:11 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 11:10:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/25/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 25, 2017 <br /> Page 22 <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the number of people involved and parking, as well as <br /> limiting activities, would be addressed by staff during the building permit process. <br /> Specific to the underlying zoning, Mayor Roe noted that an earlier discussion for <br /> another use on this property had addressed that issue and it had been explained <br /> that the zoning is the PUD itself and therefore, that underlying zoning no longer <br /> existed. Mayor Roe noted that the city's zoning code had been changed in 2010 <br /> with zoning indicated on a map, but that the PUD remained in place as the zoning <br /> of the property. <br /> City Council Deliberation <br /> Councilmember Laliberte confirmed with City Attorney Gaughan that he was not <br /> aware of any particular legal issues to be aware of during their discussion and de- <br /> liberation of this particular item currently before them. <br /> Laliberte moved, Roe seconded, approval of the Concept PUD, an amend- <br /> ment to PUD Agreement 1177, as recommended by the Planning Commis- <br /> sion, modifying the permitted uses on the subject property to include college <br /> or post-secondary school, office-based use, as defined by Zoning Code, Sec- <br /> tion 1001.10. <br /> In stating her support of this motion, Councilmember Laliberte opined that the <br /> original PUD had a purpose that had now changed. With a new, recently-adopted <br /> PUD process in place, Councilmember Laliberte suggested a future review of all <br /> existing PUD's within that new process. <br /> Councilmember Willmus prefaced his comments by acknowledging the good of <br /> the University of Northwestern to the community and its many partnerships with <br /> the City of Roseville and its residents. Specific to this request, Councilmember <br /> Willmus noted that the area was currently zoned PUD, but also had a past of un- <br /> derlying uses resulting in the current Table of Uses. Similar to the previous re- <br /> quest coming before this City Council (mini storage use), Councilmember <br /> Willmus opined that he didn't see the nexus or connection of old use or the cur- <br /> rent Table of Uses (Table 1006.01) to be any different than the intended use. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated his agreement that this area in general and the ex- <br /> isting PUD should be looked at in the near future; however, he opined that it <br /> didn't make sense to continue amending this area. Instead, Councilmember <br /> Willmus suggested that this body and the community take a step back to see what <br /> they wanted in this area, and proceed accordingly with that new designation. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that was his issue with adding yet another PUD <br /> amendment to an existing PUD. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated her agreement with many of the comments ex- <br /> pressed by Councilmember Willmus, and didn't see the nexus between this pro- <br /> posal and existing approvals; also recognizing the residents who lost their homes <br /> when this area was changed to a business district. Councilmember McGehee stat- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.