My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_09-26_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017_09-26_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 12:10:59 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 11:43:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/26/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom Trainor Comments: <br />2.2 should "arterial" be defined here? <br />Pathway design selection chart - need to define 'ADT" ? <br />7.5 oftentimes these school facilities are not intended to be open to public use, especially during <br />non -school hours <br />12.1 & 2 seems too restrictive for the City to consult with ALL groups. Perhaps language <br />talking about "good faith efforts to meet with representative interested groups." <br />13.4 how about mountain bikes ... can they use non -paved pathways? <br />As far as City planning is concerned, should this document require that maintenance and snow <br />clearing resources have been programmed before committing to new pathway systems? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.