My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_11-28_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017_11-28_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 2:22:52 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 2:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/28/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
307 <br />308 Member Wozniak noted Item 3.1 is broad, and the following two items are more <br />309 specific. He suggested they further develop these items after the plan is approved. <br />310 <br />311 Mr. Freihammer explained the bullet points could potentially become Item 2.5 and <br />312 Member Wozniak's comment "...explore opportunities to create, expand <br />313 intermodal connectivity..." could be included in that. <br />314 <br />315 Chair Cihacek inquired if items 2.1, 2.4, and 2.5 should be consolidated into one <br />316 since they are all very similar. He suggested item 2.1 be changed to, "Proactively <br />317 promote intermodal connectivity to include transit and pathways." He also <br />318 suggested they strike "non -motorized" in item 2.1 since it is covered in a different <br />319 section. <br />320 <br />321 Mr. Freihammer suggested staff provide wording to consolidate items 2.1, 2.4, and <br />322 2.5, and bring it back to the Commission for approval. <br />323 <br />324 Item 3.1. Svstem-wide transportation capacity should be achieved by using a high <br />325 level of network connectivity, appropriately spaced and properly sized <br />326 thoroughfares and multiple travel modes, rather than by increasing the capacity of <br />327 individual thoroughfares. <br />328 Mr. Freihammer explained this change was brought up by the Planning <br />329 Commission. They suggested the end of the statement be changed to, "rR�� <br />330 b -y as an alternate to increasing the capacity of individual thoroughfares where <br />331 appropriate. <br />332 <br />333 Member Seigler recalled aprotest in Minneapolis against the addition of bike lanes, <br />334 and inquired if they should add something to make sure they do not go overboard <br />335 with bike lanes. <br />336 <br />337 Member Wozniak stated the protest was a hoax. <br />338 <br />339 Chair Cihacek explained the plan states they should design bike lanes where <br />340 appropriate. <br />341 <br />342 The Commission accepted the change to Item 3.1 as proposed by the Planning <br />343 Commission. <br />344 <br />345 Item 3.7. Maintain high-quality neighborhoods through the ongoing Citv Pavement <br />346 Management Program to rehabilitate or reconstruct Citv streets. <br />347 Member Wozniak proposed the addition of Item 3.8, as a broad statement to what <br />348 the City is already doing and suggested it include wording about environmentally <br />349 safe, effective and sustainable methods of ensuring that people have access to the <br />350 streets year round. <br />351 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.