My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_11-28_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017_11-28_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 2:22:52 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 2:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/28/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
80 revised CIP identifies added infrastructure replacement costs which will also <br />81 require a 3.0 percent increase in the sanitary sewer base fee. <br />82 <br />83 Member Heimerl stated he understands that some funding is required to go toward <br />84 specific projects. He inquired if the MCES proposes an increase in their fee for <br />85 waste, if that increase must go toward that area of the MCES budget or if they can <br />86 use it for other areas. He wants to make sure if the cost of these items is being <br />87 passed on to cities, that the money is being used for the intended purposes. <br />88 <br />89 Mr. Freihammer responded he was not sure, but he believes it must be used toward <br />90 the item related to the requested increase. <br />91 <br />92 Chair Cihacek stated this amount represents a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC). It <br />93 goes toward environmental expenses, which will go toward the cost of treating the <br />94 water. He inquired if the 3.4 percent increase is the same for all municipalities in <br />95 the service area. <br />96 <br />97 Mr. Freihammer responded it is based on proportionate flow. They know what the <br />98 costs are it is divided up by what each City uses. They have flow meters where it <br />99 comes in and goes out of the City so they know exactly how much flow comes <br />100 through the City. MCES will also begin a project this winter that has three portions <br />101 of interceptors and a collection system in the City. It is a $100,000,000 project and <br />102 will impact the neighborhood near Avon Street and County Road D and also in <br />103 Villa Park. <br />104 <br />105 Member Wozniak inquired about average sewer consumption and water usage and <br />106 if the City has considered not having them linked together in an effort to try and <br />107 use gray water and other alternatives. <br />108 1P <br />109 Mr. Freihammer responded the average is 13,000 gallons per quarter because it is <br />110 based on the winter flow and does not account for sprinkler usage in the summer. <br />111 They only measure the flow going in to the house. If people did use gray water, it <br />112 would still need to be connected to sewer consumption to convey it. It could be <br />113 further investigated if it became more popular. <br />114 <br />115 Member Seigler commented if the water was captured and reused, they would have <br />116 more going out than coming in. <br />117 <br />118 Chair Cihacek stated it is an interesting topic, but would require thousands of <br />119 people participating for it to make a difference. They would have to start with <br />120 changing the City code, and develop it from there. However, with the cold climate, <br />121 they are more limited with the amount of time this could be applicable. <br />122 <br />123 Mr. Freihammer reported the overall costs for storm water drainage decreased due <br />124 to a Stormwater Update. Included in the 20 -Year CIP are infrastructure <br />Page 3 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.