My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_11-28_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017_11-28_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 2:22:52 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 2:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/28/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
125 <br />replacement costs, and this will result in an overall increase of 3.1 percent in the <br />126 <br />storm sewer fee. <br />127 <br />128 <br />Member Seigler pointed out that more than half of the money paid into this fund is <br />129 <br />going toward the CIP. <br />130 <br />131 <br />Mr. Freihammer reported on the City's recycling operations. He stated they had a <br />132 <br />new contract last year with Eureka Recycling, and overall costs are expected to go <br />133 <br />up 6.1 percent. This represents a.50 cent increase for each home. <br />134 <br />135 <br />Mr. Freihammer referred to the graph on page 30 of the meeting packet, and pointed <br />136 <br />out that Citywide water usage is trending downward and with the base rate, they <br />137 <br />know what their revenue sources are. Compared to other cities, Roseville's total <br />138 <br />water charge is one of the highest. Some cities assess for infrastructure <br />139 <br />replacement, but in Roseville these replacements are funded solely by the water <br />140 <br />rates. <br />141 <br />142 <br />Mr. Freihammer referred to the graphs on page 32 and 33 of the meeting packet, <br />143 <br />and pointed out that Roseville's sewer charges were a little higher than the average. <br />144 <br />However, when taxes, water and sewer are all added in, Roseville is 14 percent <br />145 <br />lower than average. <br />146 <br />147 <br />Mr. Freihammer stated this will be on the agenda for consideration at the November <br />148 <br />6 City Council meeting. <br />149 <br />150 <br />Member Trainor inquired if Roseville softens its water. <br />151 <br />152 <br />Mr. Freihammer responded they do not soften the water. The water that comes from <br />153 <br />SPRWS is good and Roseville's water quality is very good. <br />154 <br />155 <br />Chair Cihacek inquired if these numbers accurately reflect the need for <br />156 <br />infrastructure replacement with water and sewer. He expressed concern that the <br />157 <br />current rates will only cover maintenance and do not provide a larger margin for <br />158 <br />significant capital improvements. <br />159 <br />160 <br />Mr. Freihammer responded they are on a robust plan to replace the failing water <br />161 <br />mains. They will back down on it in a couple years because of the water booster <br />162 <br />station and they have coordinated road replacement with water main replacement. <br />163 <br />They do not know a lot on condition rating with storm sewer and they are trying to <br />164 <br />get more information on them. There currently are not any major issues and they <br />165 <br />are being fixed as needed. <br />166 <br />167 <br />Chair Cihacek inquired how they prevent all the pump stations needing replacement <br />168 <br />at the same time in the future when are all currently being replaced now. <br />169 <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.