Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 13, 2017 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned the actual item being discussed when look- <br /> ing at a percentage of increase for the levy at 4.7%, versus the overall impact to <br /> the average property, including utility charges, at 2%. Other Council members <br /> noted that the current preliminary total impact supported by the Council was 3%. <br /> Commissioner Hodder noted that the recommendation was based on recently ap- <br /> proved school district referendums and related impacts to taxpayers. <br /> In lines 71-72, Councilmember Etten noted that the recommendation was to apply <br /> the annual $250,000 to capital needs, while on lines 113-117, staff talks about the <br /> importance of a structurally balanced operating budget for the long-term health of <br /> the organization. Given this difference in recommendations, Councilmember Et- <br /> ten asked the commission to provide their discussion that led to their CIP recom- <br /> mendation. <br /> Commissioner Harold noted the fair amount of operating reserves currently avail- <br /> able, currently far above the target reserve levels. However, as discussed at the <br /> last joint meeting, Commissioner Harold noted the number of deficits in the CIP, <br /> and therefore, the commission's conclusion and ultimate recommendation was to <br /> address CIP deficits in the short-term to reduce long-term implications, as well as <br /> recognizing some debt coming off line. <br /> Councilmember McGehee addressed her concerns with the nearly$800,000 annu- <br /> al use of reserves for the city's operating budget, and asked if the commission <br /> didn't also see that as an ongoing problem and priority over the CIP needs. <br /> Councilmember McGehee further asked if the commission had specific CIP tar- <br /> gets in the three funds currently failing, or was their recommendation to simply to <br /> apply the funds to general capital needs. <br /> Commissioner Harold agreed that it was an ongoing problem, but in the immedi- <br /> ate future, not a priority over CIP needs; and reiterated the commission's support <br /> to address short-term CIP needs first. Commissioner Harold advised that the <br /> commission didn't specifically discuss which CIP fund, but agreed that the three <br /> funds doing the poorest would be the most appropriate to address first. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that the commission's recommendation was for $250,000 <br /> annually for three years above that of the City Manager's recommended budget, <br /> creating a cumulative affect of an additional $750,000 applied to the CIP in the <br /> third year. <br /> Commissioner Zeller concurred with Mayor Roe as to the commission's recom- <br /> mendation and use of reserves over the next three years. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted the impacts if, one year from now, the balance be- <br /> tween housing and commercial tax base was reassessed and flipped from com- <br />