My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_1127
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_1127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2017 9:13:26 AM
Creation date
12/20/2017 9:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/27/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 27, 2017 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Chief Mathwig stated that it was clear to him that the Roseville community ex- <br /> pected and demanded Roseville officers to utilize body cameras, thus the grant <br /> application leveraged to provide that opportunity, as well as to replace squad <br /> cameras at the same time under those grant funds into 2018 and 2019. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon reported that the first step was to accept the grant, and <br /> then subsequently for the City Council to consider annual expenditures as part of <br /> the overall 2018 budget to expend some capital improvement plan (CIP) dollars <br /> allocated for the Police Department and shift funds accordingly. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> stated his wholehearted support, with Chief Mathwig, on the need for body cam- <br /> eras; and stated his understanding that staff was moving forward under the auspi- <br /> ces of the City Council, with this simply representing the next step in that process. <br /> If that direction was a misunderstanding on staff's part, Mr. Trudgeon apologized <br /> for any discrepancies in the process. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed appreciation for the background information <br /> and additional conversation tonight; but questioned if the intent in tonight's for- <br /> mer Consent Agenda items 9.b and 9.c was to move forward and transition from <br /> the pilot program into full-blown implementation. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon confirmed that this was the intended direction to equip all <br /> officers with purchase in 2018. However, Mr. Trudgeon clarified that this re- <br /> quested action was only to accept grant funds; with former Consent Agenda item <br /> 9.c related to replacement of existing squad cameras. Mr. Trudgeon further clari- <br /> fied that this action was not for the purchase of body cameras tonight, but con- <br /> firmed that this was the next step intended unless otherwise directed by the City <br /> Council. <br /> Mayor Roe sought clarification from staff that the squad cameras needed to be <br /> purchased/replaced whether or not body cameras were subsequently implemented. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon again referenced former Consent Agenda item 9.c for <br /> seeking approval of video equipment replacements in squads, paid from forfeiture <br /> funds, and squad equipment that would subsequently be in sync with body camer- <br /> as, but not seeking approval for the purchase of the body cameras themselves that <br /> would be presented to the City Council at a later date when seeking approval of <br /> purchases over$5,000. <br /> Mayor Roe sought clarification that the intent was to sync the in-squad cameras <br /> with future body camera equipment by readying squads in a more cost-effective <br /> manner at this time. <br /> Chief Mathwig advised that, as squads are changed out, it was more cost-effective <br /> to get replacement systems in place now with those new squads coming on line <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.