My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_1127
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_1127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2017 9:13:26 AM
Creation date
12/20/2017 9:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/27/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 27, 2017 <br /> Page 4 <br /> rather than doing so piece meal for the nineteen squads ready with necessary <br /> equipment to facilitate body cameras rather than pulling them off-line at the time <br /> the body cameras were approved for implementation. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Chief Mathwig advised that approxi- <br /> mately one month ago the internal decision had been made to stay with Panasonic <br /> for squad and body cameras when the product became available. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Chief Mathwig confirmed that the <br /> body cameras can be turned off once an officer leaves the squad. Councilmember <br /> McGehee questioned how this affected the policy as well as how it addressed pri- <br /> vacy issues previously raised (e.g. medical calls). Councilmember McGehee <br /> opined that, without a larger forum to discuss their use, body cameras didn't pro- <br /> tect citizens, but simply assisted officers when accused. Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee spoke in opposition to moving forward without a fuller policy discussion on <br /> how body cameras worked as well as addressing the significant annual cost going <br /> forward. <br /> Chief Mathwig clarified that, with the exception of a few circumstances that meet <br /> certain criteria addressed in the policy, body cameras must remain on until an in- <br /> cident is concluded. As far as medical call outs, Chief Mathwig advised that state <br /> statute had been crafted so the public would and could not have access to private <br /> data. <br /> Given the amount of hacking occurring, Councilmember McGehee questioned <br /> what the community expectations could be and what benefit the use of body cam- <br /> eras would provide through this big expenditure to the average Roseville resident. <br /> Chief Mathwig opined that, while the Roseville Police Department was already <br /> doing a good job, the use of body cameras would provide yet more increased <br /> transparency in law enforcement by recording activities and events, and docu- <br /> menting evidence for those feeling they had been aggrieved, as well as allowing <br /> officers to better record incidents in real time. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the Roseville Police Department had al- <br /> ready built more community trust between citizens and officers without the use of <br /> body cameras. Therefore, if the intent was to spend more money, Councilmember <br /> McGehee stated her preference for vetting officers and providing additional train- <br /> ing to ensure respectful and intelligent officers without the need for body camer- <br /> as. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Chief Mathwig firmly clarified that <br /> officers could not edit their videos with only administration able to do so within <br /> system parameters; with each video time and date stamped, and open for officer <br /> review and comment only, but not any editing. Chief Mathwig further advised <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.