My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_01-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018_01-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2018 11:00:34 AM
Creation date
2/9/2018 10:55:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
called the "Master Recycler/Composter" (Brandt, 2017; Hennepin County, n.d.). Upon <br />completion, those who go through the training then fulfill 30 hours of volunteer time and are <br />encouraged to continue their volunteer efforts through community events. These volunteers are <br />very hands-on in helping to enrich and contribute to programs such as a city's organics <br />recycling efforts (Hennepin County, n.d.). <br />Despite the current challenges associated with curbside organics recycling implementation, it <br />is a viable option once a transfer station has been established. Several cities' staff reported <br />successfully implementing curbside pickup for their residents while managing to keep costs at <br />a minimum. An SSO curbside organics recycling program is recommended over a commingled <br />Blue Bag program as SSO curbside cart programs have been shown to have higher resident <br />participations rates (Bednar, 2017) and fewer issues with contamination of other recyclable <br />materials (Goodwin, 2017). The higher start-up costs for implementing a curbside cart program <br />could possibly be reduced by utilizing grants such as the SCORE grant, as well as other <br />available grant funding. As previously mentioned, such funding could also be allocated to help <br />cover initial expenses of an organics recycling drop-off site for the City of Roseville. <br />Conclusion <br />To begin an organics recycling program, the City of Roseville can start by developing an <br />organics drop-off site at the Victoria Ballfields, which can be co-sponsored with Ramsey <br />County. Once a transfer station is established in the County and the City of Roseville has an <br />education and rollout program in place, an opt -in curbside cart program can be considered an <br />extremely viable option. Implementation of the drop-off site first can ease the transition to a <br />curbside cart program. Curbside pickup will make organics recycling more convenient for <br />everyone which can lead to increased participation rates. While curbside Blue Bag pickup is <br />also a viable option, there is a greater chance of contamination. For this reason, Eureka <br />Recycling is unlikely to participate in a Blue Bag program (Goodwin, 2017). No matter which <br />program is implemented, across the board it is shown that repeated outreach and education for <br />citizens is vital for the success of any program. <br />A Roseville organics recycling program is important for enhancing community sustainability <br />now and into the future. Widescale participation in organics recycling can reduce waste going <br />to landfills and greenhouse gas emissions emitted from landfills (Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency, 2017). With these recommendations and the City of Roseville's progressive attitude, <br />sustainable waste management is an achievable goal. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.