CC_Minutes_2018_0319 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Work Session Meeting Monday, March 19, 2018 Page 7 Ms. Perdu explained the blue dots show where people live. The purple dots indi- cate non-Roseville residents. LHB Consultant Lydia Major noted that 40 to 50 unique responses were counted. There is a complete survey in a community engagement process, and it includes all of the detail needed. That information can be worked into this document to whatever extent the Council wants. Mayor Roe commented that some of the maps should be reformatted for readabil- ity. Councilmember McGehee commented this is limited engagement compared to the visioning process. She suggested that doing the bar charts in full color gives an impression of a much more substantial piece of data. She would like to include the middle-schoolers and resident submitted suggestions in the Resilience Chapter as well. She also would like the outreach summarized up front to reduce repeti- tiveness of listing it in each chapter. Mayor Roe noted it is important to highlight key input just for that chapter. Councilmember Etten suggested including something like "in this section, we had this special type of outreach" that helped draw input. For the Economic Devel- opment chapter, for example,business group meetings were held. Ms. Perdu commented that the memo outlining all of the outreach efforts and par- ticipation will be included in the appendix. Mayor Roe suggested adding something about why there is less community input in this process, because it is an update. He also suggested noting that these are not statistically valid surveys, etc. Councilmember McGehee questioned why there is so much emphasis if the sur- vey is not statistically valid, and if this was a formal visioning process. Councilmember Etten commented it is important to include public input in the appropriate chapters. Councilmember Laliberte commented that if the memo will be in the appendix with every single data point, it should not be included in chapter 2. But chapter 2 also needs the context provided. Having a unique outreach that helped inform a particular chapter would be helpful. Ms. Perdu gave context to the "What We Heard" capsule included in each chap- ter, noting its purpose is to emphasize the input that informs what is in the chap- ter. The process can be de-emphasized if it is more fully articulated in chapter 2.