My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_03-27_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018_03-27_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2018 11:49:55 AM
Creation date
4/26/2018 11:46:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/27/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
::l <br />488 <br />Mr. Freihammer reported they will educate businesses affected by this ordinance. <br />489 <br />A lot of it includes general housekeeping practices that businesses can employ to <br />490 <br />prevent FOG from getting into the water. A lot of other cities have a similar <br />491 <br />ordinance in place. <br />492 <br />493 <br />Member Trainor inquired how many other cities have this in place. <br />494 <br />495 <br />Mr. Freihammer responded most cities have something in place and some cities <br />496 <br />require all existing businesses to have an interceptor in place. Golden Valley has <br />497 <br />the most restrictive requirements and staff modeled Roseville's on what Elk River <br />498 <br />requires. <br />499 <br />500 <br />Member Trainor inquired if they spoke with any oftusiness owners. He also <br />501 <br />inquired how they can provide feedback on this new or ce. <br />502 <br />503 <br />Mr. Freihammer responded they have not spoken to any business owners. They will <br />504 <br />notify businesses when this goes before the City Council and they can express <br />505 <br />feedback at the public hearing. <br />506 <br />507 <br />Mr. Culver commented it will have an immediate impact on new construction and <br />508 <br />they are not going to require it in existing businesses. They will first work with <br />509 <br />them to follow best practices. If businesses are not making any effort and there is <br />510 <br />no improvement, then installation of the grease interceptor may be required. <br />511 <br />512 <br />Member Misra inquired about kitchens associated with churches and schools. <br />513 <br />514 <br />Mr. Freihammer stated they would technically be considered existing and would be <br />515 <br />required to follow best practices like other existing establishments. If anew church <br />516 <br />came in and had a commercial kitchen, it would have to be evaluated. <br />517 <br />518 <br />Commissioner Wozniak inquired if the Metropolitan Council regulates FOG <br />519 <br />differently than other discharges. <br />520 <br />521 <br />Mr. Freihammer responded they do not. It is a collection system issue and they <br />522 <br />would look at it as a treatment issue. <br />523 <br />524 <br />Commissioner Wozniak inquired if Public Works staff would be doing the <br />525 <br />inspections and outreach. <br />526 <br />527 <br />Mr. Freihammer confirmed this. <br />528 <br />529 <br />Commissioner Wozniak inquired if restaurants who upgrade their kitchens would <br />530 <br />be required to install a grease interceptor. <br />531 <br />Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.