My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0507
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2018 9:35:07 AM
Creation date
5/24/2018 9:35:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts/Agreements
Agreement/Contract Type
Other
Contracts/Agreements - Department
Council
Purpose/Title
May 7, 2018 City Council Minutes
Council Approval Date
5/21/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 7, 2018 <br /> Page 19 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed support for authorizing distribution to the <br /> other communities on May 21st. The dates remain as-is for the benefit of the <br /> community. She asks what the City plans to do with the Comp Plans received <br /> from other communities. <br /> Mayor Roe noted it is a staff level-consideration. <br /> City Planner Lloyd noted it falls on staff to review land use plans and transporta- <br /> tion plans. The Planning Commission has indicated an interest to review what <br /> other communities are proposing. Staff can also post links to the other communi- <br /> ties' website on the City website. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte would appreciate a summary review, perhaps in a work <br /> session, because Roseville borders so many other communities. If that review <br /> happens only at the staff level, she will still not know what they are doing. She <br /> also concurred with Councilmember Laliberte's comments that this was supposed <br /> to be a technical update. It would have been nice to have more joint meetings <br /> with the Planning Commission so they knew what the Council was looking for. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked about the graphic showing the Met Council's popula- <br /> tion numbers on chapter 4, page 9. <br /> Ms. Perdue noted she has already updated the table. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked about the map 4:3 and its yellow and brown lines. <br /> City Planner Lloyd noted those are lots of skinny, deep lots coming together. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked what items still need attention from the Met Council <br /> feedback. <br /> Ms. Perdu noted that a couple of items that require more discussion are related to <br /> some of the housing items, where the Met Council was requesting more specifici- <br /> ty with regards to the timing of some of the housing strategies. That will start <br /> with a meeting with staff and then go to the Planning Commission for discussion. <br /> Depending on the significance of changes that are made to the document, that <br /> would come back to the Council. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested an icon could be created to highlight the equity <br /> piece. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that the previous discussions, the rose should <br /> never be used without the word Roseville. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.