|
�/�f �ltr ��-.VtI JFYlu-�o� �n� �'a✓�+,�/a�
<br />�� c , � ✓�r��%� �rss��l � � ���1� n �, �,�,
<br />�%� `r �t-�� h„ f�. �., ����
<br />l�l ��Y
<br />%/a x �-ne c c P .w. � ,�
<br />'J
<br />�
<br />i', � f � .,, � � r �o ,-,. l �-�,
<br />3�� 3v�; 7/ L
<br />z z, ��_s; 3���
<br />3�i3 3 z�� �/ L
<br />�
<br />l�� � 3 � �� �/
<br />Lo��a� � ��u� ��)N���e�/� T-�,r � c
<br />1987 1986 ��� �/2� �3 `� 7 �
<br />Average $100,000 Average $100,000
<br />Home Home Home Home
<br />1987 EMV $81,600 $100,000 1986 EMV $81,718 $100,000
<br />170 of $68,000 $11,560 $ 11,560 �'180 of $65,000 $11,700 $ 11,700
<br />27% of Excess .2.b3,Gii 8,640 280 of Excess 4,997 9,800
<br />Assessed Value b6-�-§�}5/S��fS7 20,200 Assessed Value 16,697 21,500
<br />City Mill Rate 15.105 15.105 City Mill Rate 14.192 14.192
<br />z ty. tdo
<br />Gross Tax 3.3Il...0$. 305.12 Gross Tax $236.96 $ 305.13
<br />(2.900) 0%
<br />Mill rates for other governmental units wi11 probably increase, but
<br />the size of those increases is not now known.
<br />The total property tax levy is further defined as follows:
<br />Property Tax Levy
<br />By Fund
<br />General Fund
<br />Contingency
<br />Recreation
<br />Equipment
<br />Permanent Impr
<br />Debt
<br />Ice Arena
<br />TOTAL
<br />1987
<br />Adopted
<br />$2,343,790
<br />290,000
<br />675,509
<br />173,000
<br />144,000
<br />1,092,150
<br />69,864
<br />54,788,813
<br />[�.mount Percent
<br />1988 Increase Increase
<br />Proposed (Decrease) (Decrease)
<br />$2,326,560
<br />290,000
<br />710,205
<br />9,620
<br />148,835
<br />1,494,476
<br />20,304
<br />$5,000,000
<br />( 17,230)
<br />0
<br />34,696
<br />(163,380)
<br />4,335
<br />402,326
<br />( 49,560)
<br />211,187
<br />( .07)
<br />0
<br />5.14
<br />(94.40)
<br />3.00
<br />36.80
<br />(71.00)
<br />4.41
<br />�
<br />
|